The Reduced Detection Rate of Signals That Are Hidden by Earthquakes: Case Studies with Spotlight Detectors That Operate at Seismic Arrays

ABSTRACT We directly test if seismic waveforms that are sourced by earthquakes and that interfere with signals sourced by underground explosions can significantly reduce the probability that such explosion signals are detected. We perform this test with multichannel correlation detectors (correlators) that use records of ground motion (templates) sourced by explosions to detect smaller signals from similar collocated sources. Our test applies these detectors against thousands of signals with a waveform injection method. This method amplitude scales a template waveform over a grid of amplitude values, adds these waveforms into a target data stream at times that create interference with background seismicity, and processes their sum with a correlator. We apply this method to explosion templates sourced in Nevada (United States) and recorded by the multichannel array NVAR. Our study compares correlator performance when we deliberately inject templates into earthquake signals relative to baseline operation that processes target waveforms injected into data that is absent of known seismicity. We find that a correlator that uses an explosion-sourced template and that can reliably detect a 1.7 ton shallowly buried explosion in background noise (a 0.97 detection rate) is unlikely to detect the same event in noisy earthquake interference (a 0.37 detection rate). This masking remains significant when explosion and earthquake origin times separate by as much as 100 s. We also find that the performance of correlators that use a template sourced by an earthquake is even more degraded and can fall from a 0.92 to a 0.16 detection rate during earthquake swarms. We conclude that earthquake seismicity can mask explosion signals with significant probability and that swarms can also mask significant repeating earthquake seismicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120250038
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Reduced Detection Rate of Signals That Are Hidden by Earthquakes: Case Studies with Spotlight Detectors That Operate at Seismic Arrays

Joshua Carmichael, Brent Delbridge, Richard Alfaro‐Diaz
2 citations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
4.96
article

The Reduced Detection Rate of Signals That Are Hidden by Earthquakes: Case Studies with Spotlight Detectors That Operate at Seismic Arrays

Joshua Carmichael, Brent Delbridge, Richard Alfaro‐Diaz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We directly test if seismic waveforms that are sourced by earthquakes and that interfere with signals sourced by underground explosions can significantly reduce the probability that such explosion signals are detected. We perform this test with multichannel correlation detectors (correlators) that use records of ground motion (templates) sourced by explosions to detect smaller signals from similar collocated sources. Our test applies these detectors against thousands of signals with a waveform injection method. This method amplitude scales a template waveform over a grid of amplitude values, adds these waveforms into a target data stream at times that create interference with background seismicity, and processes their sum with a correlator. We apply this method to explosion templates sourced in Nevada (United States) and recorded by the multichannel array NVAR. Our study compares correlator performance when we deliberately inject templates into earthquake signals relative to baseline operation that processes target waveforms injected into data that is absent of known seismicity. We find that a correlator that uses an explosion-sourced template and that can reliably detect a 1.7 ton shallowly buried explosion in background noise (a 0.97 detection rate) is unlikely to detect the same event in noisy earthquake interference (a 0.37 detection rate). This masking remains significant when explosion and earthquake origin times separate by as much as 100 s. We also find that the performance of correlators that use a template sourced by an earthquake is even more degraded and can fall from a 0.92 to a 0.16 detection rate during earthquake swarms. We conclude that earthquake seismicity can mask explosion signals with significant probability and that swarms can also mask significant repeating earthquake seismicity.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaVol. 115(4)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Syracuse University, National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, Sandia National Laboratories, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.