Prediction and analysis of flow behavior during gas kicks considering wellbore–formation coupling and gas solubility

A gas kick is one of the most dangerous phenomena during petroleum drilling operations, which, if not detected and handled in time, can result in hazardous blowout. To better understand and describe the behavior of gas kicks, this study presents a novel transient flow model by taking wellbore–formation coupling and gas solubility into account during drilling operations. Then, the main flow parameters such as gas void fraction, mixture velocity, and mixture density are analyzed in cases that do or do not consider the coupling effects. Furthermore, the flow behaviors for both oil-based mud (OBM) and water-based mud (WBM) are investigated for comparison. Finally, the reliable indicators of monitoring gas kicks in OBM and WBM drilling are discussed. The results indicate that the gas void fraction increases after an initial decrease with the increased wellbore depth with coupling effects, while it constantly decreases with the increase in the well depth with non-coupling effects. The variation in bottom-hole pressure (BHP) with gas kick time is similar in both cases. Both the mixture velocity and mixture density change more significantly in the middle–lower part of the wellbore compared with non-coupling effects. In particular, the performances of the surface response to a gas kick are quite different compared to the WBM under similar conditions in OBM drilling, and the potentially dangerous gas kick is easily neglected. More importantly, it is confirmed that pit gain is more beneficial for detecting gas kicks compared with the annulus return flow rate (ARFR) for WBM, but neither of these indicators is suitable for gas kick detection in OBM drilling. The results identify pit gain as a reliable indicator for detecting gas kicks in WBM drilling, while real-time bottom-hole pressure (BHP) monitoring is emphasized for OBM drilling under low influx rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1558305
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction and analysis of flow behavior during gas kicks considering wellbore–formation coupling and gas solubility

Jianhong Fu, Xinyu Shen, Huiyun Ma, Peng Chi et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Earth Science
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Prediction and analysis of flow behavior during gas kicks considering wellbore–formation coupling and gas solubility

Jianhong Fu, Xinyu Shen, Huiyun Ma, Peng Chi, Yu Su, Jianhua Guo, Lei Xia, Yijia Tang
article en

Abstract

A gas kick is one of the most dangerous phenomena during petroleum drilling operations, which, if not detected and handled in time, can result in hazardous blowout. To better understand and describe the behavior of gas kicks, this study presents a novel transient flow model by taking wellbore–formation coupling and gas solubility into account during drilling operations. Then, the main flow parameters such as gas void fraction, mixture velocity, and mixture density are analyzed in cases that do or do not consider the coupling effects. Furthermore, the flow behaviors for both oil-based mud (OBM) and water-based mud (WBM) are investigated for comparison. Finally, the reliable indicators of monitoring gas kicks in OBM and WBM drilling are discussed. The results indicate that the gas void fraction increases after an initial decrease with the increased wellbore depth with coupling effects, while it constantly decreases with the increase in the well depth with non-coupling effects. The variation in bottom-hole pressure (BHP) with gas kick time is similar in both cases. Both the mixture velocity and mixture density change more significantly in the middle–lower part of the wellbore compared with non-coupling effects. In particular, the performances of the surface response to a gas kick are quite different compared to the WBM under similar conditions in OBM drilling, and the potentially dangerous gas kick is easily neglected. More importantly, it is confirmed that pit gain is more beneficial for detecting gas kicks compared with the annulus return flow rate (ARFR) for WBM, but neither of these indicators is suitable for gas kick detection in OBM drilling. The results identify pit gain as a reliable indicator for detecting gas kicks in WBM drilling, while real-time bottom-hole pressure (BHP) monitoring is emphasized for OBM drilling under low influx rates.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 13
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company (China)
PetroChina Company Limited, Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.