Geography for AI sustainability and sustainability for GeoAI

Recent years have witnessed a boom in the development of multimodal large-scale generative AI models. These computationally intensive AI models, such as GPT-4, and their associated data centers have undergone increasing scrutiny in terms of their energy consumption and carbon emissions. As awareness of the energy costs and carbon footprints of AI models grows, attention has broadened to include other sustainability-related aspects such as their water consumption, transparency, and further environmental and social implications. In this work, we examine existing tools, frameworks, and evaluation metrics, complementing the ongoing discussions regarding AI’s environmental sustainability with a geographic perspective. This work, on the one hand, contributes to a geographically aware sustainability evaluation of current AI models. On the other hand, it examines the unique characteristics and challenges of GeoAI models, hoping to engage the GeoAI community in the sustainability discussion. Moving forward, we outline future directions on systematic reporting and geographically aware assessment. We then propose potential solutions, such as the adoption of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models. Ultimately, we encourage future GeoAI research to acknowledge and address their environmental and social impact, thereby guiding GeoAI toward a more transparent, responsible, and sustainable future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cartography and Geographic Information Science
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2025.2479796
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geography for AI sustainability and sustainability for GeoAI

Zilong Liu, Nina Wiedemann, Gengchen Mai, Meilin Shi et al.
8 citations
Cartography and Geographic Information Science
Big Data and Business Intelligence
18.27
article

Geography for AI sustainability and sustainability for GeoAI

Zilong Liu, Nina Wiedemann, Gengchen Mai, Meilin Shi, Judith A. Verstegen, Kitty Currier, Rui Zhu, Ivan Majić, Krzysztof Janowicz
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a boom in the development of multimodal large-scale generative AI models. These computationally intensive AI models, such as GPT-4, and their associated data centers have undergone increasing scrutiny in terms of their energy consumption and carbon emissions. As awareness of the energy costs and carbon footprints of AI models grows, attention has broadened to include other sustainability-related aspects such as their water consumption, transparency, and further environmental and social implications. In this work, we examine existing tools, frameworks, and evaluation metrics, complementing the ongoing discussions regarding AI’s environmental sustainability with a geographic perspective. This work, on the one hand, contributes to a geographically aware sustainability evaluation of current AI models. On the other hand, it examines the unique characteristics and challenges of GeoAI models, hoping to engage the GeoAI community in the sustainability discussion. Moving forward, we outline future directions on systematic reporting and geographically aware assessment. We then propose potential solutions, such as the adoption of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models. Ultimately, we encourage future GeoAI research to acknowledge and address their environmental and social impact, thereby guiding GeoAI toward a more transparent, responsible, and sustainable future.

Cartography and Geographic Information ScienceVol. 52(4)
University of Vienna (AT), Utrecht University (NL), University of California System (US), ETH Zurich (CH), University of Bristol (GB), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
18.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.