Ecological zone construction and multi-scenario simulation in Western China combining landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service value

The disparity between eastern and western China is significant, with considerable imbalances in city development. Ecological zoning can promote the comprehensive and coordinated urbanization of China and provide valuable planning references for the future development of western cities. This study focused on Hohhot, a typical western city, to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of its ecosystem service value (ESV) and landscape ecological risk (LER) from 2000 to 2020 using value-equivalence and landscape ecology methods. The Z-score method was employed to delineate ecological zones, and the PLUS model was used to predict the ecological zoning patterns under four scenarios for 2040. The study's findings revealed the following: (1) During the three periods from 2000 to 2020, Hohhot City was mainly characterized by the dominance of very low risk, low risk, and medium risk ecological levels, The areas of these levels accounted for 94.11%, 91.11%, and 90.95% of the city's total area respectively. The overall variation in ESV was minimal, with grassland, water area, forests, and arable lands constituting the primary contributors to ESV. (2) Across the four future scenarios, LER and ESV exhibited divergent trends. Under the urban development scenario, high risk areas increased the most (4.14%), while in the arable land protection scenario, very low risk areas were smallest, and low risk areas were largest. Implementing reasonable urban planning policies can enhance ESV, with notable increases in low value, medium value, and higher value areas under ecological protection, natural development, and arable land protection scenarios. (3) Combining ESV and LER dimensions, Hohhot was categorized into four ecological zones: ecological restoration reserve (Zone I), ecological rich reserve (zone II), ecological balanced protected areas (Zone III), and ecological challenge reserve (Zone IV). Differentiated management strategies were proposed for each zone. This study integrated LER and ESV for ecological zoning, offering a novel perspective for understanding ecological security. By extending temporal scales using the PLUS model, it predicted the spatial patterns of ecological zones under four scenarios, achieving dynamic ecological zoning. The findings enriched ecological zoning methodologies and provided a scientific basis for dynamic monitoring and management of ecological security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94181-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological zone construction and multi-scenario simulation in Western China combining landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service value

Bing Wang, Rula Sa, Qiuliang Zhang, Yufei Zhang et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

Ecological zone construction and multi-scenario simulation in Western China combining landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service value

Bing Wang, Rula Sa, Qiuliang Zhang, Yufei Zhang, Shuai Hao, Zi-Hao Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The disparity between eastern and western China is significant, with considerable imbalances in city development. Ecological zoning can promote the comprehensive and coordinated urbanization of China and provide valuable planning references for the future development of western cities. This study focused on Hohhot, a typical western city, to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of its ecosystem service value (ESV) and landscape ecological risk (LER) from 2000 to 2020 using value-equivalence and landscape ecology methods. The Z-score method was employed to delineate ecological zones, and the PLUS model was used to predict the ecological zoning patterns under four scenarios for 2040. The study's findings revealed the following: (1) During the three periods from 2000 to 2020, Hohhot City was mainly characterized by the dominance of very low risk, low risk, and medium risk ecological levels, The areas of these levels accounted for 94.11%, 91.11%, and 90.95% of the city's total area respectively. The overall variation in ESV was minimal, with grassland, water area, forests, and arable lands constituting the primary contributors to ESV. (2) Across the four future scenarios, LER and ESV exhibited divergent trends. Under the urban development scenario, high risk areas increased the most (4.14%), while in the arable land protection scenario, very low risk areas were smallest, and low risk areas were largest. Implementing reasonable urban planning policies can enhance ESV, with notable increases in low value, medium value, and higher value areas under ecological protection, natural development, and arable land protection scenarios. (3) Combining ESV and LER dimensions, Hohhot was categorized into four ecological zones: ecological restoration reserve (Zone I), ecological rich reserve (zone II), ecological balanced protected areas (Zone III), and ecological challenge reserve (Zone IV). Differentiated management strategies were proposed for each zone. This study integrated LER and ESV for ecological zoning, offering a novel perspective for understanding ecological security. By extending temporal scales using the PLUS model, it predicted the spatial patterns of ecological zones under four scenarios, achieving dynamic ecological zoning. The findings enriched ecological zoning methodologies and provided a scientific basis for dynamic monitoring and management of ecological security.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.