Evaluating the predictive value of log odds of positive lymph nodes on postoperative survival in patients with laryngeal cancer: a SEER population-based study

Traditionally, the AJCC TNM staging system has been the primary tool for assessing the severity and prognosis of laryngeal cancer. Although several studies have demonstrated that the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) offers superior predictive accuracy compared to the TNM staging for other cancers, there is limited research for laryngeal cancer. This study analyzed data from SEER database (2000-2019). Independent risk factors for survival were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and different prognostic models were constructed based on the multivariate analysis results. The predictive performance of these models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) values. The results indicated that LODDS subgroup, age, marital status, histologic grade, T-stage, and N-stage were consistent independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Assessment metrics showed that the multivariate model, which incorporated both LODDS and N staging, outperformed the individual N staging and LODDS models in predicting postoperative prognosis in laryngeal cancer patients. Overall, the multivariate model constructed in this study is a superior tool for predicting the postoperative status of laryngeal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Oncology
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-02193-z
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the predictive value of log odds of positive lymph nodes on postoperative survival in patients with laryngeal cancer: a SEER population-based study

Wenjie Fu, Peiji Zeng, Jiahui Zhang, Wei Wang et al.
Discover Oncology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Evaluating the predictive value of log odds of positive lymph nodes on postoperative survival in patients with laryngeal cancer: a SEER population-based study

Wenjie Fu, Peiji Zeng, Jiahui Zhang, Wei Wang, Yue Wang, Chengfu Cai, Wenjun Su
article en

Abstract

Traditionally, the AJCC TNM staging system has been the primary tool for assessing the severity and prognosis of laryngeal cancer. Although several studies have demonstrated that the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) offers superior predictive accuracy compared to the TNM staging for other cancers, there is limited research for laryngeal cancer. This study analyzed data from SEER database (2000-2019). Independent risk factors for survival were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and different prognostic models were constructed based on the multivariate analysis results. The predictive performance of these models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) values. The results indicated that LODDS subgroup, age, marital status, histologic grade, T-stage, and N-stage were consistent independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Assessment metrics showed that the multivariate model, which incorporated both LODDS and N staging, outperformed the individual N staging and LODDS models in predicting postoperative prognosis in laryngeal cancer patients. Overall, the multivariate model constructed in this study is a superior tool for predicting the postoperative status of laryngeal cancer.

Discover OncologyVol. 16(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Union Hospital (HK), Xiamen University (CN), Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.