Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI

Diagnosing eye and orbit pathologies through radiological imaging presents considerable challenges due to their low prevalence, the extensive range of possible conditions, and their variable presentations, necessitating substantial domain-specific expertise. This study evaluates whether a ML-based content-based image retrieval (CBIR) tool, combined with a curated database of orbital MRI cases with verified diagnoses, can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce reading time for radiologists diagnosing eye and orbital pathologies. It explores whether this tool alone, or in combination with status quo reference tools (e.g. Radiopaedia.org, StatDx) provides these benefits. In a multi-reader, multi-case study involving 36 radiologists and 48 retrospective orbital MRI cases, participants diagnosed eight cases: four using status quo reference tools and four with the addition of the CBIR tool. Analysis using linear mixed-effects models revealed significant improvements in diagnostic accuracy when using the CBIR tool alone (55.88% vs. 70.59%, p = 0.03, odds ratio = 2.07) and an even greater improvement when used alongside status quo tools (55.88% vs. 83.33%, p = 0.02, odds ratio = 3.65). Reading time decreased when using the CBIR tool alone (334 s vs. 236 s, p < 0.001) but increased when used in conjunction with status quo tools (334 s vs. 396 s, p < 0.001). These findings indicate that CBIR tools can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy for eye and orbit diagnostics, though their impact on reading time varies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94634-6
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI

Augustin Lecler, Bernd Hamm, Elisa Birgit Sodemann, Ali R. Sepahdari et al.
Scientific Reports
Radiology practices and education
article

Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI

Augustin Lecler, Bernd Hamm, Elisa Birgit Sodemann, Ali R. Sepahdari, Winna Lim, Sönke Langner, Dagmar Kainmueller, Josef Lorenz Rumberger, Katharina Erb‐Eigner, Benjamin Wildfeuer, Simon Stemplinger, Ahi Sema Issever
article en

Abstract

Diagnosing eye and orbit pathologies through radiological imaging presents considerable challenges due to their low prevalence, the extensive range of possible conditions, and their variable presentations, necessitating substantial domain-specific expertise. This study evaluates whether a ML-based content-based image retrieval (CBIR) tool, combined with a curated database of orbital MRI cases with verified diagnoses, can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce reading time for radiologists diagnosing eye and orbital pathologies. It explores whether this tool alone, or in combination with status quo reference tools (e.g. Radiopaedia.org, StatDx) provides these benefits. In a multi-reader, multi-case study involving 36 radiologists and 48 retrospective orbital MRI cases, participants diagnosed eight cases: four using status quo reference tools and four with the addition of the CBIR tool. Analysis using linear mixed-effects models revealed significant improvements in diagnostic accuracy when using the CBIR tool alone (55.88% vs. 70.59%, p = 0.03, odds ratio = 2.07) and an even greater improvement when used alongside status quo tools (55.88% vs. 83.33%, p = 0.02, odds ratio = 3.65). Reading time decreased when using the CBIR tool alone (334 s vs. 236 s, p < 0.001) but increased when used in conjunction with status quo tools (334 s vs. 396 s, p < 0.001). These findings indicate that CBIR tools can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy for eye and orbit diagnostics, though their impact on reading time varies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Potsdam (DE), Université Paris Cité (FR), Max Delbrück Center (DE), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), University of Applied Sciences Potsdam (DE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Scripps Clinic Medical Group (US)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Stiftung Charité, Berlin Institute of Health
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.