Pathways from eudaimonic and hedonic motives to life satisfaction via response style

Studies have demonstrated an association between eudaimonic and hedonic motives and well-being. However, these studies have not fully quantified the mediating pathways underlying this relationship. This study investigated whether the response style mediates the relationship between these motives and life satisfaction. Japanese individuals (n = 11,041) participated in this study. We assessed eudaimonic and hedonic motives using the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities-Revised, which includes three subscales: eudaimonic, pleasure, and relaxation. We assessed life satisfaction as a well-being measure using the Satisfaction with Life Scale. The two response styles-facing the fact (corresponding to active coping) and evasion (corresponding to behavioral disengagement)-were evaluated using the Expanded Response Styles Questionnaire. Path analysis was employed to test the mediating effects of response style on the relationship between eudaimonic/hedonic motives and life satisfaction. Results indicated that eudaimonic motive enhanced life satisfaction by increasing facing the fact and reducing evasion. Similarly, pleasure motive increased life satisfaction by promoting facing the fact. In contrast, the relaxation motive reduced life satisfaction by decreasing facing the fact and increasing evasion. These findings suggest that response style is a crucial pathway linking eudaimonic and hedonic motives to life satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95601-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways from eudaimonic and hedonic motives to life satisfaction via response style

T. Sato, Kohei Fuseda, Motoyuki Akamatsu, Motohiro Kimura et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Behavioral Health and Interventions
4.63
article

Pathways from eudaimonic and hedonic motives to life satisfaction via response style

T. Sato, Kohei Fuseda, Motoyuki Akamatsu, Motohiro Kimura, Fumie Sugimoto, Naoki Konishi, Minako Hosono, Ken Kihara, Damee Choi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated an association between eudaimonic and hedonic motives and well-being. However, these studies have not fully quantified the mediating pathways underlying this relationship. This study investigated whether the response style mediates the relationship between these motives and life satisfaction. Japanese individuals (n = 11,041) participated in this study. We assessed eudaimonic and hedonic motives using the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities-Revised, which includes three subscales: eudaimonic, pleasure, and relaxation. We assessed life satisfaction as a well-being measure using the Satisfaction with Life Scale. The two response styles-facing the fact (corresponding to active coping) and evasion (corresponding to behavioral disengagement)-were evaluated using the Expanded Response Styles Questionnaire. Path analysis was employed to test the mediating effects of response style on the relationship between eudaimonic/hedonic motives and life satisfaction. Results indicated that eudaimonic motive enhanced life satisfaction by increasing facing the fact and reducing evasion. Similarly, pleasure motive increased life satisfaction by promoting facing the fact. In contrast, the relaxation motive reduced life satisfaction by decreasing facing the fact and increasing evasion. These findings suggest that response style is a crucial pathway linking eudaimonic and hedonic motives to life satisfaction.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.