Subjective refraction and prescribing styles used by UK optometrists

Poor subjective refraction and prescribing techniques were identified; limited measurement of VA to full threshold, risk of over-plusing/under-minusing, limited cylinder power and axis techniques and symptoms often not reconciling with changes in prescription and improvements in VA were observed. The objective prescription, particularly as determined by autorefractors, holds an exaggerated influence over some optometrists. These are elements of everyday optometry, yet require greater emphasis in CPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13495
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective refraction and prescribing styles used by UK optometrists

David B. Elliott, Jeremy Beesley, Christopher J. Davey
1 citations
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
1.71
article

Subjective refraction and prescribing styles used by UK optometrists

David B. Elliott, Jeremy Beesley, Christopher J. Davey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Poor subjective refraction and prescribing techniques were identified; limited measurement of VA to full threshold, risk of over-plusing/under-minusing, limited cylinder power and axis techniques and symptoms often not reconciling with changes in prescription and improvements in VA were observed. The objective prescription, particularly as determined by autorefractors, holds an exaggerated influence over some optometrists. These are elements of everyday optometry, yet require greater emphasis in CPD.

Ophthalmic and Physiological OpticsVol. 45(5)
University of Bradford (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.