Trustworthiness Optimisation Process: A Methodology for Assessing and Enhancing Trust in AI Systems

The emerging capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) and the systems that employ them have reached a point where they are integrated into critical decision-making processes, making it paramount to change and adjust how they are evaluated, monitored, and governed. For this reason, trustworthy AI (TAI) has received increased attention lately, primarily aiming to build trust between humans and AI. Due to the far-reaching socio-technical consequences of AI, organisations and government bodies have already started implementing frameworks and legislation for enforcing TAI, such as the European Union’s AI Act. Multiple approaches have evolved around TAI, covering different aspects of trustworthiness that include fairness, bias, explainability, robustness, accuracy, and more. Moreover, depending on the AI models and the stage of the AI system lifecycle, several methods and techniques can be used for each trustworthiness characteristic to assess potential risks and mitigate them. Deriving from all the above is the need for comprehensive tools and solutions that can help AI stakeholders follow TAI guidelines and adopt methods that practically increase trustworthiness. In this paper, we formulate and propose the Trustworthiness Optimisation Process (TOP), which operationalises TAI and brings together its procedural and technical approaches throughout the AI system lifecycle. It incorporates state-of-the-art enablers of trustworthiness such as documentation cards, risk management, and toolkits to find trustworthiness methods that increase the trustworthiness of a given AI system. To showcase the application of the proposed methodology, a case study is conducted, demonstrating how the fairness of an AI system can be increased.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071454
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trustworthiness Optimisation Process: A Methodology for Assessing and Enhancing Trust in AI Systems

Katerina Lepenioti, Mattheos Fikardos, Gregoris Mentzas, Dimitris Apostolou
2 citations
Electronics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Trustworthiness Optimisation Process: A Methodology for Assessing and Enhancing Trust in AI Systems

Katerina Lepenioti, Mattheos Fikardos, Gregoris Mentzas, Dimitris Apostolou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The emerging capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) and the systems that employ them have reached a point where they are integrated into critical decision-making processes, making it paramount to change and adjust how they are evaluated, monitored, and governed. For this reason, trustworthy AI (TAI) has received increased attention lately, primarily aiming to build trust between humans and AI. Due to the far-reaching socio-technical consequences of AI, organisations and government bodies have already started implementing frameworks and legislation for enforcing TAI, such as the European Union’s AI Act. Multiple approaches have evolved around TAI, covering different aspects of trustworthiness that include fairness, bias, explainability, robustness, accuracy, and more. Moreover, depending on the AI models and the stage of the AI system lifecycle, several methods and techniques can be used for each trustworthiness characteristic to assess potential risks and mitigate them. Deriving from all the above is the need for comprehensive tools and solutions that can help AI stakeholders follow TAI guidelines and adopt methods that practically increase trustworthiness. In this paper, we formulate and propose the Trustworthiness Optimisation Process (TOP), which operationalises TAI and brings together its procedural and technical approaches throughout the AI system lifecycle. It incorporates state-of-the-art enablers of trustworthiness such as documentation cards, risk management, and toolkits to find trustworthiness methods that increase the trustworthiness of a given AI system. To showcase the application of the proposed methodology, a case study is conducted, demonstrating how the fairness of an AI system can be increased.

ElectronicsVol. 14(7)
University of Piraeus (GR), National Technical University of Athens (GR), Institute of Communication and Computer Systems (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.