Vacuum Dressing And Topical Antibacterial Dressing Among Patients With Diabetic Ulcer: A Comparative Study

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) represent a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, often leading to prolonged hospitalisation, amputations, and increased morbidity. Effective wound healing strategies are crucial in reducing the burden of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), particularly in resource-constrained settings such as Pakistan.AFG Objective: To compare the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) dressing and topical antibacterial dressing in promoting granulation tissue formation and reducing healing time in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, from July 2024 to December 2024. A total of 60 patients with clinically diagnosed diabetic foot ulcers were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A received a VAC dressing, while Group B received a topical antibacterial dressing (fusidic acid followed by saline gauze). Outcomes measured included the formation of granulation tissue within two weeks and the duration of complete wound healing. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of participants was 56.2 ± 9.4 years. Granulation tissue formation within two weeks was significantly higher in the VAC group (86.7%) compared to the topical dressing group (60%) (p = 0.018). The mean healing duration was shorter in the VAC group (12.3 ± 3.4 days) than in the topical group (17.6 ± 4.2 days) (p<0.001). Stratified analysis showed significantly better outcomes in patients with higher BMI, poor glycemic control, and non-smokers in the VAC group. Conclusion: VAC dressing significantly enhances granulation tissue formation and reduces healing time in patients with diabetic foot ulcers compared to topical antibacterial dressing. Its implementation in tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan could improve wound healing outcomes and reduce the burden of diabetic complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i2.1591
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vacuum Dressing And Topical Antibacterial Dressing Among Patients With Diabetic Ulcer: A Comparative Study

Mansab Ali, Syed Muhammad Tayyab, Tehmina Rafiq, Sharmin Ara et al.
1 links
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Vacuum Dressing And Topical Antibacterial Dressing Among Patients With Diabetic Ulcer: A Comparative Study

Mansab Ali, Syed Muhammad Tayyab, Tehmina Rafiq, Sharmin Ara, Syed Muhammad Mohsin Azeem, Amir Usman
article en

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) represent a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, often leading to prolonged hospitalisation, amputations, and increased morbidity. Effective wound healing strategies are crucial in reducing the burden of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), particularly in resource-constrained settings such as Pakistan.AFG Objective: To compare the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) dressing and topical antibacterial dressing in promoting granulation tissue formation and reducing healing time in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, from July 2024 to December 2024. A total of 60 patients with clinically diagnosed diabetic foot ulcers were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A received a VAC dressing, while Group B received a topical antibacterial dressing (fusidic acid followed by saline gauze). Outcomes measured included the formation of granulation tissue within two weeks and the duration of complete wound healing. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of participants was 56.2 ± 9.4 years. Granulation tissue formation within two weeks was significantly higher in the VAC group (86.7%) compared to the topical dressing group (60%) (p = 0.018). The mean healing duration was shorter in the VAC group (12.3 ± 3.4 days) than in the topical group (17.6 ± 4.2 days) (p<0.001). Stratified analysis showed significantly better outcomes in patients with higher BMI, poor glycemic control, and non-smokers in the VAC group. Conclusion: VAC dressing significantly enhances granulation tissue formation and reduces healing time in patients with diabetic foot ulcers compared to topical antibacterial dressing. Its implementation in tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan could improve wound healing outcomes and reduce the burden of diabetic complications.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 6(2)
Lahore General Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.