What and why is the "Evolutionary Scale" in Swiss Animal Welfare Law? Putting the Platypus in its Place

In the Swiss Animal Welfare Law, paragraph 20 (2) specifically requires the selection of those animal species for experiments that are “lower on the evolutionary scale”. From a biological perspective, however, the idea of an evolutionary scale is clearly outdated. In this bioethical article we will (1) analyse the potential meaning of the “evolutionary scale paragraph” in the Swiss Animal Welfare Law, (2) shed light on the consequences for animal model selection in animal research and (3) critically discuss alternative approaches to the regulation of animal model selection, including the suggestion of a case-by-case approach. Shifting from general species-specific animal properties such as the ability to feel pain to study-specific aspects such as being harmed by living in isolation or by being handled by humans in a particular way could lead to criteria that promote a selection of animal models that differs to some extent from the current research practice. Empirical data on the implementation of such animal welfare-related criteria in the actual planning of a study are, however, lacking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LEOH - Journal of Animal Law Ethics and One Health
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58590/leoh.2025.006
Primary Topic
Animal Law and Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What and why is the "Evolutionary Scale" in Swiss Animal Welfare Law? Putting the Platypus in its Place

Bernhard Hiebl, Kirsten Persson, Christian Rodriguez Perez, Peter Kunzmann et al.
LEOH - Journal of Animal Law Ethics and One Health
Animal Law and Welfare
article

What and why is the "Evolutionary Scale" in Swiss Animal Welfare Law? Putting the Platypus in its Place

Bernhard Hiebl, Kirsten Persson, Christian Rodriguez Perez, Peter Kunzmann, David Shaw, Sebastian Hartstang
article en

Abstract

In the Swiss Animal Welfare Law, paragraph 20 (2) specifically requires the selection of those animal species for experiments that are “lower on the evolutionary scale”. From a biological perspective, however, the idea of an evolutionary scale is clearly outdated. In this bioethical article we will (1) analyse the potential meaning of the “evolutionary scale paragraph” in the Swiss Animal Welfare Law, (2) shed light on the consequences for animal model selection in animal research and (3) critically discuss alternative approaches to the regulation of animal model selection, including the suggestion of a case-by-case approach. Shifting from general species-specific animal properties such as the ability to feel pain to study-specific aspects such as being harmed by living in isolation or by being handled by humans in a particular way could lead to criteria that promote a selection of animal models that differs to some extent from the current research practice. Empirical data on the implementation of such animal welfare-related criteria in the actual planning of a study are, however, lacking.

LEOH - Journal of Animal Law Ethics and One Health
University of Basel (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Animal Law and Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What and why is the "Evolutionary Scale" in Swiss Animal Welfare Law? Putting the Platypus in its Place — Bernhard Hiebl, Kirsten Persson, et al. · LEOH - Journal of Animal Law Ethics and One Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS