Comparative effectiveness of myofascial release versus conventional physiotherapy in bicipital tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives Bicipital tendinopathy (BT) is considered one of the major differential diagnoses of anterior shoulder pain, often accompanied by a restricted or painful range of motion (ROM). Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of myofascial release (MFR) in alleviating pain and improving ROM in patients with BT. Materials and Methods Sixty participants were randomly assigned into two equal groups: A control group and an experimental/test group. The control group (30) received a pre-determined physiotherapy (PT) session. The test group (30) underwent three manual MFR therapy sessions every fifth day starting from day one. Pain during maximum ROM, by visual analog score, and degree of maximum ROM by a digital inclinometer were assessed 2 min before and 2 min after each intervention. Repeated-measures analysis of variance subsequently, the Bonferroni post hoc test was used to measure the statistical significance. Results Pain during ROM was measured on first day pre- and post-intervention, fifth day pre- and post-intervention, and on the tenth day pre- and post-intervention and as follows: 7.8 ± 0.4, 6.7 ± 0.4, 6.6 ± 0.4, 5.9 ± 0.4, 5.7 ± 0.4, and 5.4 ± 0.4, respectively. In the experimental group, the corresponding values were 7.6 ± 0.4, 5.3 ± 0.4, 4.6 ± 0.4, 3.7 ± 0.4, 3.4 ± 0.4, and 2.7 ± 0.4. compared to the baseline, both groups showed a significant improvement in pain scores after each session ( P < 0.001). The baseline pain levels during ROM were similar between the control and experimental groups ( P > 0.999). Those receiving MFR showed a significantly greater reduction in pain soon after each session, starting on day one ( P < 0.001), compared to the conventional PT group. In addition, patients in the control group experienced a significant improvement in ROM, increasing from 169.9° ± 0.2.14° to 176.1° ± 1.15° ( P < 0.01), whereas MFR improved ROM markedly from 150.1° ± 9.58° up to 180.0° ± 0.0° ( P < 0.05). Conclusion MFR is more pronounced than conventional PT in alleviating painful shoulder ROM associated with BT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Arthroscopic Surgery and Sports Medicine
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jassm_60_2024
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness of myofascial release versus conventional physiotherapy in bicipital tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial

Yakupiti Himan Shashidara De Silva, Sanka Theekshana Thebuwanaarachchi, Sampath Gunawardena, Hemamali Perera et al.
Journal of Arthroscopic Surgery and Sports Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Comparative effectiveness of myofascial release versus conventional physiotherapy in bicipital tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial

Yakupiti Himan Shashidara De Silva, Sanka Theekshana Thebuwanaarachchi, Sampath Gunawardena, Hemamali Perera, Omega Kasthriya Lokuyaddage De Silva, M. B. Samarawickrama
article en

Abstract

Objectives Bicipital tendinopathy (BT) is considered one of the major differential diagnoses of anterior shoulder pain, often accompanied by a restricted or painful range of motion (ROM). Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of myofascial release (MFR) in alleviating pain and improving ROM in patients with BT. Materials and Methods Sixty participants were randomly assigned into two equal groups: A control group and an experimental/test group. The control group (30) received a pre-determined physiotherapy (PT) session. The test group (30) underwent three manual MFR therapy sessions every fifth day starting from day one. Pain during maximum ROM, by visual analog score, and degree of maximum ROM by a digital inclinometer were assessed 2 min before and 2 min after each intervention. Repeated-measures analysis of variance subsequently, the Bonferroni post hoc test was used to measure the statistical significance. Results Pain during ROM was measured on first day pre- and post-intervention, fifth day pre- and post-intervention, and on the tenth day pre- and post-intervention and as follows: 7.8 ± 0.4, 6.7 ± 0.4, 6.6 ± 0.4, 5.9 ± 0.4, 5.7 ± 0.4, and 5.4 ± 0.4, respectively. In the experimental group, the corresponding values were 7.6 ± 0.4, 5.3 ± 0.4, 4.6 ± 0.4, 3.7 ± 0.4, 3.4 ± 0.4, and 2.7 ± 0.4. compared to the baseline, both groups showed a significant improvement in pain scores after each session ( P < 0.001). The baseline pain levels during ROM were similar between the control and experimental groups ( P > 0.999). Those receiving MFR showed a significantly greater reduction in pain soon after each session, starting on day one ( P < 0.001), compared to the conventional PT group. In addition, patients in the control group experienced a significant improvement in ROM, increasing from 169.9° ± 0.2.14° to 176.1° ± 1.15° ( P < 0.01), whereas MFR improved ROM markedly from 150.1° ± 9.58° up to 180.0° ± 0.0° ( P < 0.05). Conclusion MFR is more pronounced than conventional PT in alleviating painful shoulder ROM associated with BT.

Journal of Arthroscopic Surgery and Sports MedicineVol. 7
University of Ruhuna (LK), National Hospital of Sri Lanka (LK), Sri Lanka Foundation (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.