Non‐Gaussian variational data assimilation with reverse‐lognormal errors

Abstract For the majority of data assimilation (DA) applications, a Gaussian assumption is made to model the behaviour of errors associated with the specific situation. This assumption is generally false in geoscience fields, especially for variables that are positive (semi‐)definite. The three‐dimensional variational (3DVar) data‐assimilation method was traditionally generated through Bayes' theorem with Gaussian multivariate probability density functions; however, over the last 15 years this assumption has been modified to allow for a lognormal distribution, as well as combining the Gaussian and lognormal distributions to form a mixed Gaussian–lognormal distribution. In this article, we adapt this assumption and allow these errors to be reverse‐lognormally distributed. This is done by applying the Bayesian probability framework to derive a reverse‐lognormal 3DVar cost function. With the new reverse‐lognormally distributed 3DVar, we use machine‐learning methods to detect which 3DVar method (Gaussian, lognormal, reverse‐lognormal) is suitable to minimise the errors in that region of the Lorenz 1963 model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4965
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐Gaussian variational data assimilation with reverse‐lognormal errors

M. J. Hossen, Steven J. Fletcher, Senne Van Loon, Michael Goodliff
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

Non‐Gaussian variational data assimilation with reverse‐lognormal errors

M. J. Hossen, Steven J. Fletcher, Senne Van Loon, Michael Goodliff
article en

Abstract

Abstract For the majority of data assimilation (DA) applications, a Gaussian assumption is made to model the behaviour of errors associated with the specific situation. This assumption is generally false in geoscience fields, especially for variables that are positive (semi‐)definite. The three‐dimensional variational (3DVar) data‐assimilation method was traditionally generated through Bayes' theorem with Gaussian multivariate probability density functions; however, over the last 15 years this assumption has been modified to allow for a lognormal distribution, as well as combining the Gaussian and lognormal distributions to form a mixed Gaussian–lognormal distribution. In this article, we adapt this assumption and allow these errors to be reverse‐lognormally distributed. This is done by applying the Bayesian probability framework to derive a reverse‐lognormal 3DVar cost function. With the new reverse‐lognormally distributed 3DVar, we use machine‐learning methods to detect which 3DVar method (Gaussian, lognormal, reverse‐lognormal) is suitable to minimise the errors in that region of the Lorenz 1963 model.

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyVol. 151(770)
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (US), RIKEN Center for Computational Science (JP), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.