LegalTech 3.0. Some Reflections on the Constitutional Prerequisites for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Justice

New technologies are increasingly present in the administration of justice. Recognised for their effectiveness and diverse possibilities, they are becoming increasingly important tools to support the functioning of the justice system. Due to their continuous development, the idea has emerged in the scientific space that tools based on one of them – artificial intelligence – should no longer be used as merely supporting judges, but as those that could replace the judge in fulfilling his or her tasks. Shaping the judiciary in this way, with an algorithmic judge – for this is essentially what the proposal is aiming at – raises constitutional questions. Indeed, constitutional law to date has developed certain standards to which a modern court must conform. The fulfilment of these standards by artificial intelligence is debatable; the analysis devoted to it is the subject of the article.The Author’s goal is to answer the question of whether constitutional law today is ready for artificial intelligence in the administration of justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Europejski Przegląd Prawa i Stosunków Międzynarodowych.
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52097/eppism.9663
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LegalTech 3.0. Some Reflections on the Constitutional Prerequisites for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Justice

Beata Stępień-Załucka
Europejski Przegląd Prawa i Stosunków Międzynarodowych.
Digital Transformation in Law
article

LegalTech 3.0. Some Reflections on the Constitutional Prerequisites for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Justice

Beata Stępień-Załucka
article en

Abstract

New technologies are increasingly present in the administration of justice. Recognised for their effectiveness and diverse possibilities, they are becoming increasingly important tools to support the functioning of the justice system. Due to their continuous development, the idea has emerged in the scientific space that tools based on one of them – artificial intelligence – should no longer be used as merely supporting judges, but as those that could replace the judge in fulfilling his or her tasks. Shaping the judiciary in this way, with an algorithmic judge – for this is essentially what the proposal is aiming at – raises constitutional questions. Indeed, constitutional law to date has developed certain standards to which a modern court must conform. The fulfilment of these standards by artificial intelligence is debatable; the analysis devoted to it is the subject of the article.The Author’s goal is to answer the question of whether constitutional law today is ready for artificial intelligence in the administration of justice.

Europejski Przegląd Prawa i Stosunków Międzynarodowych.(1/2025/73)
University of Rzeszów (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

LegalTech 3.0. Some Reflections on the Constitutional Prerequisites for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Justice — Beata Stępień-Załucka · Europejski Przegląd Prawa i Stosunków Międzynarodowych. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS