Medical Errors in Islamic Jurisprudence: An Analytical Study

Medical errors are a complex issue that requires careful examination in light of Islamic jurisprudence, as they involve various legal and ethical considerations related to civil and criminal liability, the principles of liability (ḍamān), and the distinction between error (khaṭā’) and negligence (ta‘addī). This study explores how classical and contemporary Islamic jurists have addressed medical errors, outlining the principles governing physician responsibility and analyzing their applicability in modern medical practice. The research aims to define medical error within Islamic jurisprudence, differentiate it from intentional harm and negligence, and evaluate the extent of a physician’s liability according to different Islamic schools of thought. Additionally, it compares Islamic rulings with modern medical laws to assess their compatibility. The study concludes that Islamic jurisprudence offers a comprehensive framework for addressing medical errors, balancing physician accountability with fairness, and emphasizing the role of expertise and customary practices (‘urf) in determining liability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2345
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical Errors in Islamic Jurisprudence: An Analytical Study

Mohammed Ali M. Alasmari
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Medical Errors in Islamic Jurisprudence: An Analytical Study

Mohammed Ali M. Alasmari
article en

Abstract

Medical errors are a complex issue that requires careful examination in light of Islamic jurisprudence, as they involve various legal and ethical considerations related to civil and criminal liability, the principles of liability (ḍamān), and the distinction between error (khaṭā’) and negligence (ta‘addī). This study explores how classical and contemporary Islamic jurists have addressed medical errors, outlining the principles governing physician responsibility and analyzing their applicability in modern medical practice. The research aims to define medical error within Islamic jurisprudence, differentiate it from intentional harm and negligence, and evaluate the extent of a physician’s liability according to different Islamic schools of thought. Additionally, it compares Islamic rulings with modern medical laws to assess their compatibility. The study concludes that Islamic jurisprudence offers a comprehensive framework for addressing medical errors, balancing physician accountability with fairness, and emphasizing the role of expertise and customary practices (‘urf) in determining liability.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.