Understanding the Different Generational Motivations and Adoption of AI in Families: Integrating Technology Acceptance and Uses and Gratifications Theory

This study examines AI adoption within families through a generational lens, revealing how age-related motivations shape AI engagement across generations. By integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Uses and Gratifications (U&G) theory, this research explores extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of AI use, uncovering how factors influence AI adoption among adolescents and parents. Surveying 120 families, including 200 adolescents and 160 parents, we employed SEM-PLS to validate our model, revealing distinct patterns in AI preferences across age groups. Findings indicate that while ease of use, usefulness, and socialization consistently drive AI engagement, personal integrative factors are especially impactful within the Iranian context. Our results highlight intergenerational differences that inform family-centered AI design and policy, offering a culturally nuanced framework for AI development that bridges generational divides. This study delivers insights for policymakers, and researchers, providing a roadmap for inclusive AI adoption strategies that honor cultural and generational needs within families.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i26s.4239
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Different Generational Motivations and Adoption of AI in Families: Integrating Technology Acceptance and Uses and Gratifications Theory

Nie Ni
1 citations
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
4.17
article

Understanding the Different Generational Motivations and Adoption of AI in Families: Integrating Technology Acceptance and Uses and Gratifications Theory

Nie Ni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines AI adoption within families through a generational lens, revealing how age-related motivations shape AI engagement across generations. By integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Uses and Gratifications (U&G) theory, this research explores extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of AI use, uncovering how factors influence AI adoption among adolescents and parents. Surveying 120 families, including 200 adolescents and 160 parents, we employed SEM-PLS to validate our model, revealing distinct patterns in AI preferences across age groups. Findings indicate that while ease of use, usefulness, and socialization consistently drive AI engagement, personal integrative factors are especially impactful within the Iranian context. Our results highlight intergenerational differences that inform family-centered AI design and policy, offering a culturally nuanced framework for AI development that bridges generational divides. This study delivers insights for policymakers, and researchers, providing a roadmap for inclusive AI adoption strategies that honor cultural and generational needs within families.

Journal of Information Systems Engineering & ManagementVol. 10(26s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the Different Generational Motivations and Adoption of AI in Families: Integrating Technology Acceptance and Uses and Gratifications Theory — Nie Ni · Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS