Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients with T1-T4 Melanoma at Critical Structures Treated with Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision

Background: Guidelines recommend staging melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for a predicted risk of SLN metastasis 10% and considering SLNB for 5-10% risk.A gene expression profile (GEP)-based test that accurately identifies patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis would help refine patient selection for SLNB, but current guidelines advise against using GEP for SLN risk prediction absent prospective trial data.This blinded prospective multicenter study evaluated the performance of a test combining clinicopathologic factors (age, Breslow thickness) with an 8-gene GEP (CP-GEP test) for predicting SLN status in patients undergoing SLNB.Methods: Eligible patients with pT1-T3 cN0M0 cutaneous melanoma undergoing clinically indicated SLNB were prospectively enrolled in 11 melanoma referral centers in the United States.T1a patients could only be enrolled if at least one high risk feature was present: age <40, mitotic count 2 mm2, or presence of lymphovascular invasion.The CP-GEP was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary tumor biopsy and results reported in binary fashion as Low or High Risk.The primary endpoint was negative predictive value (NPV) in Low Risk patients.Preplanned analyses included assessment by T substage and age.Results: The GEP was successfully performed in 97.7% of samples.1,755 patients of these patients underwent SLNB (17.6% SLN-positive); 37% were classified as Low Risk.Among all patients classified as Low Risk, the SLN was positive in 7.1% for an NPV of 92.9% (95% CI 90.7-94.8%).High Risk patients were SLN positive in 23.8%.Most T1b patients (67.6%) were Low Risk, with an NPV of 94.8% (95% CI 91.7-96.9%);fewer T2a patients were Low Risk (36.7%), with an NPV of 91.8% (95 CI 87.7-94.9%).The SLN positive rate in clinical stage IB patents classified as Low Risk (49.3% of all stage IB) was 6.6%, with an NPV of 93.4% (95% CI 91.1-95.3%).In clinical stage IIA/B, only 7.6% of patients were designated as Low Risk (17.1% SLN-positive).Test performance was consistent across age subgroups, including a SLN positive rate in Low Risk patients 65 years old of 6.6% (95% CI 4.2-9.7%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EJC Skin Cancer
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcskn.2025.100590
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients with T1-T4 Melanoma at Critical Structures Treated with Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision

Roberto Patuzzo, Giuseppe Spadola, Valeria Summo, Barbara Valeri et al.
1 links
EJC Skin Cancer
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients with T1-T4 Melanoma at Critical Structures Treated with Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision

Roberto Patuzzo, Giuseppe Spadola, Valeria Summo, Barbara Valeri, Andrea Maurichi, Gianfrancesco Gallino, Mara Cossa, Ilaria Mattavelli, Rosalba Miceli, Francesco Barretta, Simona Mercurio, Umberto Cortinovis, Elena Tolomio, B. Taglione, Consuelo Barbieri, Mario Santinami, Denis A. Cortese, Biancamaria Scoppio
article en

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend staging melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for a predicted risk of SLN metastasis 10% and considering SLNB for 5-10% risk.A gene expression profile (GEP)-based test that accurately identifies patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis would help refine patient selection for SLNB, but current guidelines advise against using GEP for SLN risk prediction absent prospective trial data.This blinded prospective multicenter study evaluated the performance of a test combining clinicopathologic factors (age, Breslow thickness) with an 8-gene GEP (CP-GEP test) for predicting SLN status in patients undergoing SLNB.Methods: Eligible patients with pT1-T3 cN0M0 cutaneous melanoma undergoing clinically indicated SLNB were prospectively enrolled in 11 melanoma referral centers in the United States.T1a patients could only be enrolled if at least one high risk feature was present: age <40, mitotic count 2 mm2, or presence of lymphovascular invasion.The CP-GEP was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary tumor biopsy and results reported in binary fashion as Low or High Risk.The primary endpoint was negative predictive value (NPV) in Low Risk patients.Preplanned analyses included assessment by T substage and age.Results: The GEP was successfully performed in 97.7% of samples.1,755 patients of these patients underwent SLNB (17.6% SLN-positive); 37% were classified as Low Risk.Among all patients classified as Low Risk, the SLN was positive in 7.1% for an NPV of 92.9% (95% CI 90.7-94.8%).High Risk patients were SLN positive in 23.8%.Most T1b patients (67.6%) were Low Risk, with an NPV of 94.8% (95% CI 91.7-96.9%);fewer T2a patients were Low Risk (36.7%), with an NPV of 91.8% (95 CI 87.7-94.9%).The SLN positive rate in clinical stage IB patents classified as Low Risk (49.3% of all stage IB) was 6.6%, with an NPV of 93.4% (95% CI 91.1-95.3%).In clinical stage IIA/B, only 7.6% of patients were designated as Low Risk (17.1% SLN-positive).Test performance was consistent across age subgroups, including a SLN positive rate in Low Risk patients 65 years old of 6.6% (95% CI 4.2-9.7%).

EJC Skin CancerVol. 3
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.