African-Asian relations in the era of western domination of global economy

In a world characterized by economic hegemons, contemporary African-Asian relations are subject to the influences of Euro-American dominance on the one hand and the imperfections of regional integration processes and local challenges on the other. Historically grounded in anti-colonial solidarity, these ties have shifted to strategic economic partnerships as both regions seek to carve their paths in what is becoming an increasingly Western-led world order. The 1955 Bandung Conference was an important event where newly independent countries came together in solidarity against imperialism and called for South-South cooperation. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and India’s investment in African infrastructure are among modern examples of growing engagements in the continent, propelled by trade, resource extraction, and geopolitical influence. However, these ties are also controversial—although they provide alternatives to conditionalities imposed by Western powers, critics point to neo-colonial threats as well, such as debt dependency and unbalanced trade. Asia’s dollar-fuelled ascent has mapped out a new geography for Africa in global supply chains, but the inequalities of the structure remain. Western lenders retain a stranglehold on capital flows, while East African countries rely more and more on Asian markets for technology, loans, and infrastructure. Rivalry between smaller Asian economies includes Japan and South Korea, having developed aid and soft power in contrast to China’s state-driven investments. Africa’s AfCFTA, meanwhile, aims to emulate ASEAN’s integration model to increase regional self-reliance. These shifts reveal a dual-pronged reality: Afro-Asian relations contest Western hegemony while being conditioned by it. Externally, tensions cloud the relationship, from “sovereign power” labor disputes involving Asian-owned mines in Africa to debates over sustainable development. However, if shared interests in a multipolar world are increasing, asymmetries of power and control of resources remain. This study suggests that despite the transformative potential of African-Asian relations, these relations require overcoming neo-extractive tendencies to attain equitable growth. As the two regions reshape the global future of globalization, their partnership has the potential to either reproduce old hierarchies or pave the way for alternative economic paradigms that transcend Western hegemony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of interdisciplinary research.
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31039/bjir.v2i5.32
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

African-Asian relations in the era of western domination of global economy

Saleel Chembayi
British journal of interdisciplinary research.
International Development and Aid
article

African-Asian relations in the era of western domination of global economy

Saleel Chembayi
article en

Abstract

In a world characterized by economic hegemons, contemporary African-Asian relations are subject to the influences of Euro-American dominance on the one hand and the imperfections of regional integration processes and local challenges on the other. Historically grounded in anti-colonial solidarity, these ties have shifted to strategic economic partnerships as both regions seek to carve their paths in what is becoming an increasingly Western-led world order. The 1955 Bandung Conference was an important event where newly independent countries came together in solidarity against imperialism and called for South-South cooperation. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and India’s investment in African infrastructure are among modern examples of growing engagements in the continent, propelled by trade, resource extraction, and geopolitical influence. However, these ties are also controversial—although they provide alternatives to conditionalities imposed by Western powers, critics point to neo-colonial threats as well, such as debt dependency and unbalanced trade. Asia’s dollar-fuelled ascent has mapped out a new geography for Africa in global supply chains, but the inequalities of the structure remain. Western lenders retain a stranglehold on capital flows, while East African countries rely more and more on Asian markets for technology, loans, and infrastructure. Rivalry between smaller Asian economies includes Japan and South Korea, having developed aid and soft power in contrast to China’s state-driven investments. Africa’s AfCFTA, meanwhile, aims to emulate ASEAN’s integration model to increase regional self-reliance. These shifts reveal a dual-pronged reality: Afro-Asian relations contest Western hegemony while being conditioned by it. Externally, tensions cloud the relationship, from “sovereign power” labor disputes involving Asian-owned mines in Africa to debates over sustainable development. However, if shared interests in a multipolar world are increasing, asymmetries of power and control of resources remain. This study suggests that despite the transformative potential of African-Asian relations, these relations require overcoming neo-extractive tendencies to attain equitable growth. As the two regions reshape the global future of globalization, their partnership has the potential to either reproduce old hierarchies or pave the way for alternative economic paradigms that transcend Western hegemony.

British journal of interdisciplinary research.Vol. 2(5)
Nile University of Nigeria (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.