Assessment of debris flow risk according to damage type

Abstract The spatial distribution of hazard risk due to debris flows is discussed using a horizontal two-dimensional numerical simulation of debris flow, and the hazards are evaluated according to the type of damage. Compared to the hazard areas between the flow depth of the debris flow and the building destruction, many of the areas inundated by debris flows are outside the hazardous area for building destruction. Compared to the hazard areas between the building destruction and the sediment deposition, there is almost no overlap between the two areas. In other words, the area away from the stream exit does not suffer from severe damage such as the destruction of buildings, but it is not completely free from damage due to the accumulation of sediment on the site and the inflow of sediment into the houses. It is important to evaluate the hazard level for various types of damage when considering the hard and soft countermeasures against debris flow damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Disaster Science and Management
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44367-025-00005-3
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of debris flow risk according to damage type

Masaharu Fujita, Hidetoshi Nakamoto, Hiroshi TAKEBAYASHI
3 citations
Journal of Disaster Science and Management
Landslides and related hazards
7.27
article

Assessment of debris flow risk according to damage type

Masaharu Fujita, Hidetoshi Nakamoto, Hiroshi TAKEBAYASHI
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The spatial distribution of hazard risk due to debris flows is discussed using a horizontal two-dimensional numerical simulation of debris flow, and the hazards are evaluated according to the type of damage. Compared to the hazard areas between the flow depth of the debris flow and the building destruction, many of the areas inundated by debris flows are outside the hazardous area for building destruction. Compared to the hazard areas between the building destruction and the sediment deposition, there is almost no overlap between the two areas. In other words, the area away from the stream exit does not suffer from severe damage such as the destruction of buildings, but it is not completely free from damage due to the accumulation of sediment on the site and the inflow of sediment into the houses. It is important to evaluate the hazard level for various types of damage when considering the hard and soft countermeasures against debris flow damage.

Journal of Disaster Science and ManagementVol. 1(1)
Kyoto University (JP), TOKU-E (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Landslides and related hazards
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of debris flow risk according to damage type — Masaharu Fujita, Hidetoshi Nakamoto, et al. · Journal of Disaster Science and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS