Influence of Organizational Power on Human Resources (HR) Recruitment in Afghanistan: Nepotism, Conflict of Interest, and Beyond

Purpose – This study examines unethical recruitment practices within Afghanistan's HR sector, including nepotism, favoritism, and external pressures. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was conducted among 127 HR professionals from various organizations in Afghanistan, including HR & Admin Officers, HR Assistants, HR Coordinators, HR Directors, HR Managers, HR Officers, HR Panel Members, and HR Specialists & Analysts. Participants were from international (50), national (65), and public (12) organizations. Findings – Significant unethical practices such as nepotism, conflicts of interest, harassment, coercion, favoritism, personal connections, gender biases, local authority influences, financial incentives, and external pressures impact recruitment decisions. These practices violate principles of procedural fairness and trust in recruitment. Research limitations/implications – Limitations include belief on self-reported data, sample representation, and cross-sectional design. Future research should involve longitudinal studies, broader samples, mixed-method approaches, and digital tools. Practical implications – Implementing strict anti-nepotism policies, guidelines for conflicts of interest, measures to prevent harassment and coercion, and promoting transparency are essential. Training HR professionals in ethical practices is crucial. Social implications – Addressing unethical recruitment practices promotes fairness, transparency, and inclusivity, enhancing organizational performance and employee commitment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i28s.4346
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Organizational Power on Human Resources (HR) Recruitment in Afghanistan: Nepotism, Conflict of Interest, and Beyond

Mohammad Noori
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

Influence of Organizational Power on Human Resources (HR) Recruitment in Afghanistan: Nepotism, Conflict of Interest, and Beyond

Mohammad Noori
article en

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines unethical recruitment practices within Afghanistan's HR sector, including nepotism, favoritism, and external pressures. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was conducted among 127 HR professionals from various organizations in Afghanistan, including HR & Admin Officers, HR Assistants, HR Coordinators, HR Directors, HR Managers, HR Officers, HR Panel Members, and HR Specialists & Analysts. Participants were from international (50), national (65), and public (12) organizations. Findings – Significant unethical practices such as nepotism, conflicts of interest, harassment, coercion, favoritism, personal connections, gender biases, local authority influences, financial incentives, and external pressures impact recruitment decisions. These practices violate principles of procedural fairness and trust in recruitment. Research limitations/implications – Limitations include belief on self-reported data, sample representation, and cross-sectional design. Future research should involve longitudinal studies, broader samples, mixed-method approaches, and digital tools. Practical implications – Implementing strict anti-nepotism policies, guidelines for conflicts of interest, measures to prevent harassment and coercion, and promoting transparency are essential. Training HR professionals in ethical practices is crucial. Social implications – Addressing unethical recruitment practices promotes fairness, transparency, and inclusivity, enhancing organizational performance and employee commitment.

Journal of Information Systems Engineering & ManagementVol. 10(28s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.