Contemporary Intellectual History: Theory, Intellectual History, and How They Collaborate

Abstract How far back must we go before we can write intellectual history? If I am working on a particular author, must that author be dead for me to investigate them as a historian? Must their private papers be available? This article argues that the tendency to respond “Yes” to these questions mistakenly assumes that it is not possible to write intellectual histories of contemporary thinkers. I make an argument for what I call contemporary intellectual history as a form of inquiry, and I claim that contemporary intellectual history is one way of doing theory. To explain these positions and build a case for them, I engage with the work of the contemporary philosopher Robert Brandom. I focus on his most recent book, A Spirit of Trust (2019), which adds crucial new elements to his decades-long project of articulating inferentialism and grapples directly with how historical inquiry and philosophical work can collaborate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Philosophy of History
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341546
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary Intellectual History: Theory, Intellectual History, and How They Collaborate

David Marshall
Journal of the Philosophy of History
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

Contemporary Intellectual History: Theory, Intellectual History, and How They Collaborate

David Marshall
article en

Abstract

Abstract How far back must we go before we can write intellectual history? If I am working on a particular author, must that author be dead for me to investigate them as a historian? Must their private papers be available? This article argues that the tendency to respond “Yes” to these questions mistakenly assumes that it is not possible to write intellectual histories of contemporary thinkers. I make an argument for what I call contemporary intellectual history as a form of inquiry, and I claim that contemporary intellectual history is one way of doing theory. To explain these positions and build a case for them, I engage with the work of the contemporary philosopher Robert Brandom. I focus on his most recent book, A Spirit of Trust (2019), which adds crucial new elements to his decades-long project of articulating inferentialism and grapples directly with how historical inquiry and philosophical work can collaborate.

Journal of the Philosophy of HistoryVol. 20(1)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.