The Use of Psychoactive Medications and Non-medication Alternatives for Cats and Dogs in North American Animal Shelters and Rescues

Introduction: Animals in shelters commonly experience fear, anxiety, and stress. Psychoactive medications and non-medication alternative options are recommended and used in shelters to manage these negative affective states, yet little is known about the current practices, perceptions, and barriers surrounding their use. Methods: This study investigated the use and perceptions of psychoactive medications and non-medication alternative options in animal shelters and rescues across Canada, the United States, and Mexico. An online survey collected responses from 233 participants representing 148 unique shelters, focusing on the frequency of use, comfort administering, and efficacy, as well as barriers and considerations influencing psychoactive medication and non-medication alternative use decisions. Results: Results showed that dogs experiencing fear were more frequently treated with psychoactive medications than cats experiencing fear. Gabapentin and fluoxetine were the most commonly used medications for fearful cats, while trazodone and gabapentin were the most commonly used for fearful dogs, with respondents reporting high ratings for both comfort in administering these medications to animals, and perceived efficacy of these medications at reducing anxiety in animals. Pheromones and nutraceuticals were the most commonly used non-medication alternative options. There was high agreement with the statement that admittance to an animal shelter is the main cause of behavior and welfare problems, and that welfare concerns are a key justification for providing psychoactive medication. Cost and uncertainty about the efficacy of treatments emerged as leading barriers to psychoactive medication administration. Specific characteristics, including the respondent’s role and type of shelter, influenced perceptions about psychoactive medications and alternatives, and barriers to their use. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of further understanding the efficacy and safety of psychoactive medication and alternatives, as well as addressing the barriers to their administration, to improve overall welfare outcomes for cats and dogs in shelter and rescue environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal Health
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56771/jsmcah.v4.115
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Psychoactive Medications and Non-medication Alternatives for Cats and Dogs in North American Animal Shelters and Rescues

Amin Azadian, Karen van Haaften, Alexandra Protopopova, Bailey H. Eagan
1 citations
Journal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal Health
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
article

The Use of Psychoactive Medications and Non-medication Alternatives for Cats and Dogs in North American Animal Shelters and Rescues

Amin Azadian, Karen van Haaften, Alexandra Protopopova, Bailey H. Eagan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Animals in shelters commonly experience fear, anxiety, and stress. Psychoactive medications and non-medication alternative options are recommended and used in shelters to manage these negative affective states, yet little is known about the current practices, perceptions, and barriers surrounding their use. Methods: This study investigated the use and perceptions of psychoactive medications and non-medication alternative options in animal shelters and rescues across Canada, the United States, and Mexico. An online survey collected responses from 233 participants representing 148 unique shelters, focusing on the frequency of use, comfort administering, and efficacy, as well as barriers and considerations influencing psychoactive medication and non-medication alternative use decisions. Results: Results showed that dogs experiencing fear were more frequently treated with psychoactive medications than cats experiencing fear. Gabapentin and fluoxetine were the most commonly used medications for fearful cats, while trazodone and gabapentin were the most commonly used for fearful dogs, with respondents reporting high ratings for both comfort in administering these medications to animals, and perceived efficacy of these medications at reducing anxiety in animals. Pheromones and nutraceuticals were the most commonly used non-medication alternative options. There was high agreement with the statement that admittance to an animal shelter is the main cause of behavior and welfare problems, and that welfare concerns are a key justification for providing psychoactive medication. Cost and uncertainty about the efficacy of treatments emerged as leading barriers to psychoactive medication administration. Specific characteristics, including the respondent’s role and type of shelter, influenced perceptions about psychoactive medications and alternatives, and barriers to their use. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of further understanding the efficacy and safety of psychoactive medication and alternatives, as well as addressing the barriers to their administration, to improve overall welfare outcomes for cats and dogs in shelter and rescue environments.

Journal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal HealthVol. 4(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.