An Updated Prediction Model for the Maximum Expected Treatment Time with a Cranial Remolding Orthosis

ABSTRACT Introduction Caregivers of infants with deformational head shapes frequently inquire about treatment time estimations. In 2022, a predictive model (V1) was tested and a new model proposed (V2), which estimates maximum expected treatment duration with a cranial remolding orthosis (CRO). This retrospective study assesses the accuracy of V2 and proposes a third version (V3) of the model. Methods Subjects with deformational head shapes who were treated with a CRO between 3 and 18 months postpartum were included based on initial cranial measurements. Infants were excluded if they had a significant comorbidities, missing data, or had documented noncompliance. Separate datasets were used to derive and validate V2. Results Derivation of V2 included 1,460 subjects and a separate 294 subjects were used for validation. 81.44% of the plagiocephalic infants, 63.39% of the brachycephalic infants, and 76.77% of the asymmetrical brachycephalic infants completed treatment on or before the predicted timeframe. Predictions tended to overshoot compared to the actual treatment time but showed less variance in the standard deviations than V1. Conclusions V2 had improved accuracy across all studied head shapes. A slight overestimation in the predicted treatment time may lead to improved caregiver satisfaction associated with a shorter than expected treatment duration. Overshooting of the model is possibly due to demographic differences in the training data and validation data. Decreased variance in standard deviation of the revised model is attributed to the increased subject pool used in the derivation, thus creating increased precision of the model. Clinical Relevance Currently, no clinically accepted predictive model exists for an accurate estimation of CRO treatment duration, so providers primarily rely on clinical experience. An accurate model may help clinicians set realistic timeframes leading to increased treatment satisfaction from enhanced communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jpo.0000000000000564
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Updated Prediction Model for the Maximum Expected Treatment Time with a Cranial Remolding Orthosis

Jijia Wang, Tiffany Graham, Fabian A. Calderon, Darren Poidevin
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

An Updated Prediction Model for the Maximum Expected Treatment Time with a Cranial Remolding Orthosis

Jijia Wang, Tiffany Graham, Fabian A. Calderon, Darren Poidevin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Caregivers of infants with deformational head shapes frequently inquire about treatment time estimations. In 2022, a predictive model (V1) was tested and a new model proposed (V2), which estimates maximum expected treatment duration with a cranial remolding orthosis (CRO). This retrospective study assesses the accuracy of V2 and proposes a third version (V3) of the model. Methods Subjects with deformational head shapes who were treated with a CRO between 3 and 18 months postpartum were included based on initial cranial measurements. Infants were excluded if they had a significant comorbidities, missing data, or had documented noncompliance. Separate datasets were used to derive and validate V2. Results Derivation of V2 included 1,460 subjects and a separate 294 subjects were used for validation. 81.44% of the plagiocephalic infants, 63.39% of the brachycephalic infants, and 76.77% of the asymmetrical brachycephalic infants completed treatment on or before the predicted timeframe. Predictions tended to overshoot compared to the actual treatment time but showed less variance in the standard deviations than V1. Conclusions V2 had improved accuracy across all studied head shapes. A slight overestimation in the predicted treatment time may lead to improved caregiver satisfaction associated with a shorter than expected treatment duration. Overshooting of the model is possibly due to demographic differences in the training data and validation data. Decreased variance in standard deviation of the revised model is attributed to the increased subject pool used in the derivation, thus creating increased precision of the model. Clinical Relevance Currently, no clinically accepted predictive model exists for an accurate estimation of CRO treatment duration, so providers primarily rely on clinical experience. An accurate model may help clinicians set realistic timeframes leading to increased treatment satisfaction from enhanced communication.

JPO Journal of Prosthetics and OrthoticsVol. 38(1)
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (US), New York College of Health Professions (US), University of Limpopo (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.