Was Lausanne a Victory or a Defeat?

Abstract In 1965, Kadir Mısıroğlu published a two-volume study of the Lausanne Treaty titled: ‘Was Lausanne a victory or a crushing defeat?’ Despite being a work far from responding to the requirements of historiography, the book was a source of inspiration for the young generation of historians who aimed at reviewing the orthodoxy of Kemalist history and, simultaneously, committed to rediscovering the missed glorious past. The book was also pivotal in shaping the islamist minds with its sophisticated conspiracies but also in building a new image of self and the policy of ‘take back control’ from perceived internal or external enemies. This is also relevant in the 2023 general elections campaigns and in building the ak Parti’s legitimacy. This paper aims to examine the early historical narration by Islamists and how it contributed to the Islamist understanding of history with the example of the Islamist image of İsmet İnönü. To understand how the historical narration has evolved and how their narrative is still influential, the focus will be on three authors: Kısakürek and Mısıroğlu, who are the intellectuals who have contributed the most to the invention of this narrative, and Armağan, who today is continuing it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Islam
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22131418-11020003
Primary Topic
Political and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Was Lausanne a Victory or a Defeat?

Michelangelo Guida
Sociology of Islam
Political and Social Issues
article

Was Lausanne a Victory or a Defeat?

Michelangelo Guida
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 1965, Kadir Mısıroğlu published a two-volume study of the Lausanne Treaty titled: ‘Was Lausanne a victory or a crushing defeat?’ Despite being a work far from responding to the requirements of historiography, the book was a source of inspiration for the young generation of historians who aimed at reviewing the orthodoxy of Kemalist history and, simultaneously, committed to rediscovering the missed glorious past. The book was also pivotal in shaping the islamist minds with its sophisticated conspiracies but also in building a new image of self and the policy of ‘take back control’ from perceived internal or external enemies. This is also relevant in the 2023 general elections campaigns and in building the ak Parti’s legitimacy. This paper aims to examine the early historical narration by Islamists and how it contributed to the Islamist understanding of history with the example of the Islamist image of İsmet İnönü. To understand how the historical narration has evolved and how their narrative is still influential, the focus will be on three authors: Kısakürek and Mısıroğlu, who are the intellectuals who have contributed the most to the invention of this narrative, and Armağan, who today is continuing it.

Sociology of IslamVol. 11(2-3)
Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Political and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Was Lausanne a Victory or a Defeat? — Michelangelo Guida · Sociology of Islam (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS