Conceptual Engineering for Historians

Abstract Reviewing a sixteen-essay collection of essays on time, ethics and philosophy of history, involving a wide and eclectic range of cultural, anthropological and philosophical traditions and sources, I find the mix confusing. Needing to start from scratch, I adopt a pragmatic approach, enabling me to draw on neuroscience and link memory to imagination in order to structure the historical field. The field needs conceptualising, but I argue that, against compositionality, our understanding of a concept needs to be widened to include the linguistic practices characteristically adopted by historians, the creation of whole narratives. These are analysed as large-scale units of meaning, conceptualising time-extended objects of memory and imagination. I show that a similar widening is required for ethical concepts, and the centrality of evaluation for narrative construction is thereby clarified. The collection’s many essays are individually analysed and judged in the light of this approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Philosophy of History
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341544
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual Engineering for Historians

Jonathan Gorman
1 links
Journal of the Philosophy of History
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Conceptual Engineering for Historians

Jonathan Gorman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Reviewing a sixteen-essay collection of essays on time, ethics and philosophy of history, involving a wide and eclectic range of cultural, anthropological and philosophical traditions and sources, I find the mix confusing. Needing to start from scratch, I adopt a pragmatic approach, enabling me to draw on neuroscience and link memory to imagination in order to structure the historical field. The field needs conceptualising, but I argue that, against compositionality, our understanding of a concept needs to be widened to include the linguistic practices characteristically adopted by historians, the creation of whole narratives. These are analysed as large-scale units of meaning, conceptualising time-extended objects of memory and imagination. I show that a similar widening is required for ethical concepts, and the centrality of evaluation for narrative construction is thereby clarified. The collection’s many essays are individually analysed and judged in the light of this approach.

Journal of the Philosophy of History
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptual Engineering for Historians — Jonathan Gorman · Journal of the Philosophy of History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS