Knowing Monsters and Knowing Myself. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s Methodological Sentimentalism

Abstract Should historians studying mass crimes set aside the emotions that these crimes evoke? Positive and negative responses to this question can be referred to as methodological objectivism and subjectivism, respectively. This paper addresses this debate based on a case study: Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioner’s methodological sentimentalism. First, I reconstruct Goldhagen’s position and then criticize its central assumption. The upshot of this case study is that methodological sentimentalists should decide between two conceptions of inferential self-knowledge, esthetic and scientific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Philosophy of History
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341545
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowing Monsters and Knowing Myself. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s Methodological Sentimentalism

Raphaël Künstler
Journal of the Philosophy of History
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
article

Knowing Monsters and Knowing Myself. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s Methodological Sentimentalism

Raphaël Künstler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Should historians studying mass crimes set aside the emotions that these crimes evoke? Positive and negative responses to this question can be referred to as methodological objectivism and subjectivism, respectively. This paper addresses this debate based on a case study: Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioner’s methodological sentimentalism. First, I reconstruct Goldhagen’s position and then criticize its central assumption. The upshot of this case study is that methodological sentimentalists should decide between two conceptions of inferential self-knowledge, esthetic and scientific.

Journal of the Philosophy of HistoryVol. 20(1)
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.