Teachers’ self-reported knowledge and perceptions of intensive interventions: An initial investigation

Abstract Students with and at-risk for disabilities frequently need interventions to be intensified to increase effectiveness. Intensifying interventions requires teachers to make decisions not only on when to adapt the intervention, but also how to intensify instruction. To assist teachers, Fuchs et al. (2018) developed the Taxonomy of Intervention Intensity which details research-based principles for intensifying interventions. While there is work examining teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of systems of tiered interventions and supports and teacher knowledge and perceptions of intensive interventions, a study has not been conducted to examine teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of different types of instructional intensifications for reading interventions. In this initial investigation, we used an online survey to examine self-reported knowledge and perceptions of feasibility and effectiveness of the methods of intensification included in the taxonomy and also perceived barriers to implementing intensive interventions among a convenience sample of K-12 teachers ( n = 81). We found teachers generally perceived themselves as knowledgeable of the different methods of intensification. Teachers surveyed also perceived the methods as more useful in helping students reach their goals than feasible to implement in practice. A majority of teachers noted a lack of resources (e.g., funding, staff, materials) was a barrier to effective implementation of intensive interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading and Writing
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10650-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers’ self-reported knowledge and perceptions of intensive interventions: An initial investigation

Rachel E. Donegan, Jessica N. Torelli, Ellen G. Casale
1 citations
Reading and Writing
Educational and Psychological Assessments
3.44
article

Teachers’ self-reported knowledge and perceptions of intensive interventions: An initial investigation

Rachel E. Donegan, Jessica N. Torelli, Ellen G. Casale
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Students with and at-risk for disabilities frequently need interventions to be intensified to increase effectiveness. Intensifying interventions requires teachers to make decisions not only on when to adapt the intervention, but also how to intensify instruction. To assist teachers, Fuchs et al. (2018) developed the Taxonomy of Intervention Intensity which details research-based principles for intensifying interventions. While there is work examining teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of systems of tiered interventions and supports and teacher knowledge and perceptions of intensive interventions, a study has not been conducted to examine teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of different types of instructional intensifications for reading interventions. In this initial investigation, we used an online survey to examine self-reported knowledge and perceptions of feasibility and effectiveness of the methods of intensification included in the taxonomy and also perceived barriers to implementing intensive interventions among a convenience sample of K-12 teachers ( n = 81). We found teachers generally perceived themselves as knowledgeable of the different methods of intensification. Teachers surveyed also perceived the methods as more useful in helping students reach their goals than feasible to implement in practice. A majority of teachers noted a lack of resources (e.g., funding, staff, materials) was a barrier to effective implementation of intensive interventions.

Reading and Writing
University of Georgia (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Western Kentucky University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teachers’ self-reported knowledge and perceptions of intensive interventions: An initial investigation — Rachel E. Donegan, Jessica N. Torelli, et al. · Reading and Writing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS