Is Moss Still a Reliable Biomonitor of Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition After Decades of Emissions Reductions?

Mosses are widely used as biomonitors of atmospheric nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition due to their broad distribution, ease of sampling, and capacity to trap and accumulate atmospheric particles. However, since 2000, S emissions have decreased by more than 80% across Europe, and N oxides by 40-50%. This study evaluated whether moss remains effective for monitoring atmospheric N and S deposition after decades of emission reductions. This assessment was conducted at 33 rural sites in Tuscany, Central Italy, a region characterized by relatively low levels of N and S deposition. The content of N and S in moss were compared with the air concentrations (gases and particles) and wet and dry deposition of N and S from the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of Long-range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe (EMEP) model and an air pollution index derived from trace element concentrations. The average N content of moss (1.15 ± 0.42%) was an order of magnitude greater than that of S (0.11 ± 0.02%), reflecting the dominance of N deposition. Nevertheless, N and S in moss were strongly correlated (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.55), suggesting shared sources. Further, N showed a strong correlation with the dry deposition of oxidized N (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.53), while S was strongly correlated with the wet deposition of S oxides (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.53) and magnetic susceptibility (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.69). Overall, our findings confirm that mosses remain effective biomonitors of N and S deposition and can provide reliable spatial and temporal monitoring, especially as the traditional monitoring networks decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14071114
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lichen and fungal ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Moss Still a Reliable Biomonitor of Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition After Decades of Emissions Reductions?

Inga Ivanovna Zinicovscaia, Monia Renzi, Ilaria Bonini, Mehriban Jafarova et al.
2 citations
Plants
Lichen and fungal ecology
6.05
article

Is Moss Still a Reliable Biomonitor of Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition After Decades of Emissions Reductions?

Inga Ivanovna Zinicovscaia, Monia Renzi, Ilaria Bonini, Mehriban Jafarova, Serena Anselmi, Julian Aherne, Nikita Yushin, Stefano Loppi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Mosses are widely used as biomonitors of atmospheric nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition due to their broad distribution, ease of sampling, and capacity to trap and accumulate atmospheric particles. However, since 2000, S emissions have decreased by more than 80% across Europe, and N oxides by 40-50%. This study evaluated whether moss remains effective for monitoring atmospheric N and S deposition after decades of emission reductions. This assessment was conducted at 33 rural sites in Tuscany, Central Italy, a region characterized by relatively low levels of N and S deposition. The content of N and S in moss were compared with the air concentrations (gases and particles) and wet and dry deposition of N and S from the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of Long-range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe (EMEP) model and an air pollution index derived from trace element concentrations. The average N content of moss (1.15 ± 0.42%) was an order of magnitude greater than that of S (0.11 ± 0.02%), reflecting the dominance of N deposition. Nevertheless, N and S in moss were strongly correlated (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.55), suggesting shared sources. Further, N showed a strong correlation with the dry deposition of oxidized N (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.53), while S was strongly correlated with the wet deposition of S oxides (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.53) and magnetic susceptibility (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.69). Overall, our findings confirm that mosses remain effective biomonitors of N and S deposition and can provide reliable spatial and temporal monitoring, especially as the traditional monitoring networks decline.

PlantsVol. 14(7)
University of Siena (IT), University of Trieste (IT), Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (RU), Trent University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lichen and fungal ecology
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.