Comparative Study on the Credibility of AI-Generated News Content and Traditional News Content

Currently, the credibility of AI-generated news content is one of the greatest problems in the development of AIGC technology in journalism. To explore this problem, this article compares the credibility of AI-generated news content and traditional news content in three main aspects: the amount and quality of used data, the personal bias of journalists, and the information transparency of the news content. Through case analysis, data citation, and critical thinking, this study reveals that AI-generated news benefits from vast training data and objective algorithms, reducing personal bias and enabling broad coverage. However, its credibility is undermined by the potential inclusion of inaccurate or biased data and a lack of transparency regarding algorithms and data sources. By examining both the advantages and disadvantages of AI-generated and traditional news content, this study provides ideas and thoughts for the future development of AIGC technology in journalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology, philosophy and psychology.
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70267/vs7xzc44
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on the Credibility of AI-Generated News Content and Traditional News Content

Aiyun Hua
Sociology, philosophy and psychology.
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
article

Comparative Study on the Credibility of AI-Generated News Content and Traditional News Content

Aiyun Hua
article en

Abstract

Currently, the credibility of AI-generated news content is one of the greatest problems in the development of AIGC technology in journalism. To explore this problem, this article compares the credibility of AI-generated news content and traditional news content in three main aspects: the amount and quality of used data, the personal bias of journalists, and the information transparency of the news content. Through case analysis, data citation, and critical thinking, this study reveals that AI-generated news benefits from vast training data and objective algorithms, reducing personal bias and enabling broad coverage. However, its credibility is undermined by the potential inclusion of inaccurate or biased data and a lack of transparency regarding algorithms and data sources. By examining both the advantages and disadvantages of AI-generated and traditional news content, this study provides ideas and thoughts for the future development of AIGC technology in journalism.

Sociology, philosophy and psychology.Vol. 2(1)
Nanjing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.