Incentive payments in the system of labor remuneration of employees: problems of law enforcement

Disputes on the recovery of wages from the employer are invariably leading in the ranking of individual labor disputes, which is not surprising, since for many persons working under a labor contract, wages are the main, and often the only, means of subsistence. One of the reasons for the large number of such legal disputes is the approach of the legislator, who attributed the establishment of the remuneration system to the discretion of the employer and allowed him to create the relevant rules independently or within the framework of social partnership. And while the law establishes minimum guarantees for employees with regard to such components of wages as remuneration for labor and compensatory payments, there are no legal provisions with regard to incentive payments, which means that the employer can establish almost any rules in local normative regulation. The subject matter of this article is judicial acts issued in disputes related to the recovery of incentive payments, including bonuses, from employers in favor of employees. Analysis of law enforcement practice leads to the following conclusions. Firstly, courts quite often ignore the issue of determining the legal nature of the collected bonus (despite the fact that the legislation provides for two types of bonuses - a bonus as part of wages and a bonus as an incentive measure), believing that the payment of a bonus is the employer's right, not its obligation. Secondly, even if the legal nature of a bonus as a part of earnings is correctly defined, law enforcers still do not consider the employer obliged to pay it. Thirdly, courts consider the payment of the incentive part of wages to employees within the framework of an effective contract as ordinary bonuses, as a result of which employees are often deprived of payment for a part of their labor. In order to refract the law enforcement trend, the author considers it advisable to improve legislative regulation, which implies the establishment of minimum framework rules on incentive payments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Labour & Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2025.115
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incentive payments in the system of labor remuneration of employees: problems of law enforcement

Natalia V. Pugacheva
Russian Journal of Labour & Law
Legal and Policy Issues
article

Incentive payments in the system of labor remuneration of employees: problems of law enforcement

Natalia V. Pugacheva
article en

Abstract

Disputes on the recovery of wages from the employer are invariably leading in the ranking of individual labor disputes, which is not surprising, since for many persons working under a labor contract, wages are the main, and often the only, means of subsistence. One of the reasons for the large number of such legal disputes is the approach of the legislator, who attributed the establishment of the remuneration system to the discretion of the employer and allowed him to create the relevant rules independently or within the framework of social partnership. And while the law establishes minimum guarantees for employees with regard to such components of wages as remuneration for labor and compensatory payments, there are no legal provisions with regard to incentive payments, which means that the employer can establish almost any rules in local normative regulation. The subject matter of this article is judicial acts issued in disputes related to the recovery of incentive payments, including bonuses, from employers in favor of employees. Analysis of law enforcement practice leads to the following conclusions. Firstly, courts quite often ignore the issue of determining the legal nature of the collected bonus (despite the fact that the legislation provides for two types of bonuses - a bonus as part of wages and a bonus as an incentive measure), believing that the payment of a bonus is the employer's right, not its obligation. Secondly, even if the legal nature of a bonus as a part of earnings is correctly defined, law enforcers still do not consider the employer obliged to pay it. Thirdly, courts consider the payment of the incentive part of wages to employees within the framework of an effective contract as ordinary bonuses, as a result of which employees are often deprived of payment for a part of their labor. In order to refract the law enforcement trend, the author considers it advisable to improve legislative regulation, which implies the establishment of minimum framework rules on incentive payments.

Russian Journal of Labour & LawVol. 15
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.