Patterns in Heart Rate Variability during Hemodialysis

Key Points Heart rate variability (HRV) metrics did not significantly change over the course of hemodialysis sessions, suggesting poor autonomic function during dialysis. A novel device (Elite HRV CorSense) accurately measured time-domain (but not frequency-domain) HRV metrics compared with a gold-standard electrocardiogram device. Background Decreased heart rate variability (HRV) is a measure of poor cardiovascular health and inability of the autonomic nervous system to respond to stress. Accumulation of uremic toxins in kidney failure, volume shifts, and clearance of uremic toxins by dialysis may affect HRV. We sought to evaluate how HRV changes over the course of hemodialysis sessions and evaluate a novel HRV sensor. Methods Among 22 participants treated with in-center hemodialysis, we evaluated time-domain and frequency-domain HRV metrics with a gold-standard electrocardiogram (ECG) device (Schiller Cardiovit AT-10 Plus) and a novel fingertip sensor (Elite HRV CorSense) at five time points during two consecutive dialysis sessions. Changes over the session were evaluated by linear mixed models with random effect terms for participant and session. Devices were compared using correlation coefficients, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and linear regression. Results There were no significant changes in HRV metrics over the dialysis session ( P value for trend across ECG 0.11, across CorSense 0.58). Time-domain HRV metrics were moderately correlated between the two methods (correlation coefficient for SD of N-N interval 0.72 and for RMSSD 0.66), whereas frequency-domain methods were not. Linear models comparing CorSense and ECG readings suggested strong association for time-domain metrics. Conclusions HRV metrics did not significantly change over the course of hemodialysis sessions, suggesting poor autonomic function during dialysis. A novel fingertip sensor accurately measured time-domain (but not frequency-domain) HRV metrics when compared with a gold-standard ECG device.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kidney360
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34067/kid.0000000788
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns in Heart Rate Variability during Hemodialysis

Leila R. Zelnick, Ian H. de Boer, Benjamin Lidgard, Nathaniel Ashford et al.
1 citations
Kidney360
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
1.39
article

Patterns in Heart Rate Variability during Hemodialysis

Leila R. Zelnick, Ian H. de Boer, Benjamin Lidgard, Nathaniel Ashford, Nisha Bansal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Key Points Heart rate variability (HRV) metrics did not significantly change over the course of hemodialysis sessions, suggesting poor autonomic function during dialysis. A novel device (Elite HRV CorSense) accurately measured time-domain (but not frequency-domain) HRV metrics compared with a gold-standard electrocardiogram device. Background Decreased heart rate variability (HRV) is a measure of poor cardiovascular health and inability of the autonomic nervous system to respond to stress. Accumulation of uremic toxins in kidney failure, volume shifts, and clearance of uremic toxins by dialysis may affect HRV. We sought to evaluate how HRV changes over the course of hemodialysis sessions and evaluate a novel HRV sensor. Methods Among 22 participants treated with in-center hemodialysis, we evaluated time-domain and frequency-domain HRV metrics with a gold-standard electrocardiogram (ECG) device (Schiller Cardiovit AT-10 Plus) and a novel fingertip sensor (Elite HRV CorSense) at five time points during two consecutive dialysis sessions. Changes over the session were evaluated by linear mixed models with random effect terms for participant and session. Devices were compared using correlation coefficients, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and linear regression. Results There were no significant changes in HRV metrics over the dialysis session ( P value for trend across ECG 0.11, across CorSense 0.58). Time-domain HRV metrics were moderately correlated between the two methods (correlation coefficient for SD of N-N interval 0.72 and for RMSSD 0.66), whereas frequency-domain methods were not. Linear models comparing CorSense and ECG readings suggested strong association for time-domain metrics. Conclusions HRV metrics did not significantly change over the course of hemodialysis sessions, suggesting poor autonomic function during dialysis. A novel fingertip sensor accurately measured time-domain (but not frequency-domain) HRV metrics when compared with a gold-standard ECG device.

Kidney360Vol. 6(8)
University of Washington (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.