Knowing Digital Governance from Below

This paper considers the question of what it is to ‘know’ digital governance through an experiential, bottom-up lens, and presents some empirical detail from recent fieldwork with feminist movement actors in northern India – both formally organised feminist ‘workers’ and the broader social movement. Despite existing post-structural, feminist, post- and de-colonial work that has demonstrated the importance of understanding partial and situated perspectives, governance through the digital (rather than of the digital) has largely been understood from top-down, policy perspectives that focus on the intentions behind the governance tools. Drawing on digital ethnographic work carried out between 2019 and 2023, I argue that what is revealed through studying digital governance from the perspective of those who are governed is a deeply affective relationship with digital technology. Working within a digital space, feminists acknowledge and respond to their own perceived lack of knowledge of digital technology: a ‘digital skills divide’. This is explicitly acknowledged; the partialness of knowledge is part of the knowledge itself. In the context of increasing threats and perceived threats in the digital space – of violence, harassment and surveillance – feminists seek to organise specifically around the need for better digital skills and also employ strategies to keep themselves ‘safe’ while organising online. Digital governance from this perspective is a power relationship of socio-technical intimacies as well as a simply an organising structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Extreme Anthropology
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/jea.11782
Citations
1
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowing Digital Governance from Below

Catherine Anna Crawford
1 citations
Journal of Extreme Anthropology
E-Government and Public Services
8.52
article

Knowing Digital Governance from Below

Catherine Anna Crawford
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper considers the question of what it is to ‘know’ digital governance through an experiential, bottom-up lens, and presents some empirical detail from recent fieldwork with feminist movement actors in northern India – both formally organised feminist ‘workers’ and the broader social movement. Despite existing post-structural, feminist, post- and de-colonial work that has demonstrated the importance of understanding partial and situated perspectives, governance through the digital (rather than of the digital) has largely been understood from top-down, policy perspectives that focus on the intentions behind the governance tools. Drawing on digital ethnographic work carried out between 2019 and 2023, I argue that what is revealed through studying digital governance from the perspective of those who are governed is a deeply affective relationship with digital technology. Working within a digital space, feminists acknowledge and respond to their own perceived lack of knowledge of digital technology: a ‘digital skills divide’. This is explicitly acknowledged; the partialness of knowledge is part of the knowledge itself. In the context of increasing threats and perceived threats in the digital space – of violence, harassment and surveillance – feminists seek to organise specifically around the need for better digital skills and also employ strategies to keep themselves ‘safe’ while organising online. Digital governance from this perspective is a power relationship of socio-technical intimacies as well as a simply an organising structure.

Journal of Extreme AnthropologyVol. 8(2)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
E-Government and Public Services
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.