Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship

BACKGROUND: Experiences of hardship, such as trouble paying bills and food insecurity, vary considerably across different household living arrangements, with relatively low levels among married-couple households. OBJECTIVE: We examine the extent to which disparities across household types can be explained by differences in income, non-income resources such as wealth, demographic characteristics, and socioeconomic characteristics such as education. METHODS: We used 2021 data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and OLS regression and decomposition analysis to examine this issue. RESULTS: We confirmed that married-couple households experienced fewer hardships than other household types; single-parent families with children experienced the most hardships. Other household types, such as cohabiting couples and people living alone, fell in between. Among the factors associated with the differences, non-income resources – particularly wealth – played the most significant role, followed by income and then demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that income and especially the wealth-building capacity of different types of households are the most important factors explaining household hardship disparities. Meanwhile, selection into different household types by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics is moderately important. CONTRIBUTION: This study provides new information on why we observe differences in hardship across different types of households, including the important role played by wealth.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Demographic Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2025.52.20
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship

John Iceland, Jaehoon Cho
3 citations
Demographic Research
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
12.60
article

Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship

John Iceland, Jaehoon Cho
article en
3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experiences of hardship, such as trouble paying bills and food insecurity, vary considerably across different household living arrangements, with relatively low levels among married-couple households. OBJECTIVE: We examine the extent to which disparities across household types can be explained by differences in income, non-income resources such as wealth, demographic characteristics, and socioeconomic characteristics such as education. METHODS: We used 2021 data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and OLS regression and decomposition analysis to examine this issue. RESULTS: We confirmed that married-couple households experienced fewer hardships than other household types; single-parent families with children experienced the most hardships. Other household types, such as cohabiting couples and people living alone, fell in between. Among the factors associated with the differences, non-income resources – particularly wealth – played the most significant role, followed by income and then demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that income and especially the wealth-building capacity of different types of households are the most important factors explaining household hardship disparities. Meanwhile, selection into different household types by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics is moderately important. CONTRIBUTION: This study provides new information on why we observe differences in hardship across different types of households, including the important role played by wealth.

Demographic ResearchVol. 52
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.