IPEM topical report: guidance for the use of linac manufacturer integrated quality control

This report provides guidance for users of linear accelerator (linac) manufacturer integrated quality control (MIQC) tools. MIQC tools have been developed and introduced by radiotherapy linac vendors, and have the potential to improve both the quality and efficiency of linac quality control (QC). They usually utilise the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID), but may acquire data from other sources, and automatically perform and analyse tests of various treatment machine QC parameters. The currently available systems meeting this definition are Varian machine performance check, CyberKnife automated quality assurance /end-to-end, TomoTherapy Quality Assurance, and Elekta machine QA (also known as AQUA). This guidance report covers the commissioning and implementation of MIQC. The guidance has been developed by a radiotherapy special interest group working party on behalf of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Recommendations within the report are derived from the experience of the working party members, existing guidance, literature, and a United Kingdom survey conducted in 2022 (Pearson<i>et al</i>2023<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>68</b>245018). Topics covered include developing an understanding of the QC system, independence review of MIQC, commissioning, implementation, ongoing QC and calibration, software upgrades and periodic review. The commissioning section covers detector commissioning, repeatability and reproducibility, baseline and tolerance setting, concordance with existing QC, sensitivity testing, cost-benefits analysis, and risk assessment methods. In order to offer practical guidance, case studies covering each aspect of commissioning are included. They are real-world examples or experiences from early adopters, each applied to a different example MIQC system. The examples will be directly applicable to users of that specific MIQC system, but also provide practical guidance on clinical implementation to users of the other systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc8f7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IPEM topical report: guidance for the use of linac manufacturer integrated quality control

Rakesh Kizhakke Veetil, Richard Delany, Joe R. Whitbourn, Simon W Stevens et al.
1 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
article

IPEM topical report: guidance for the use of linac manufacturer integrated quality control

Rakesh Kizhakke Veetil, Richard Delany, Joe R. Whitbourn, Simon W Stevens, Michael P. Barnes, Kirstie Brown, S. Weston, Michael Pearson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This report provides guidance for users of linear accelerator (linac) manufacturer integrated quality control (MIQC) tools. MIQC tools have been developed and introduced by radiotherapy linac vendors, and have the potential to improve both the quality and efficiency of linac quality control (QC). They usually utilise the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID), but may acquire data from other sources, and automatically perform and analyse tests of various treatment machine QC parameters. The currently available systems meeting this definition are Varian machine performance check, CyberKnife automated quality assurance /end-to-end, TomoTherapy Quality Assurance, and Elekta machine QA (also known as AQUA). This guidance report covers the commissioning and implementation of MIQC. The guidance has been developed by a radiotherapy special interest group working party on behalf of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Recommendations within the report are derived from the experience of the working party members, existing guidance, literature, and a United Kingdom survey conducted in 2022 (Pearson<i>et al</i>2023<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>68</b>245018). Topics covered include developing an understanding of the QC system, independence review of MIQC, commissioning, implementation, ongoing QC and calibration, software upgrades and periodic review. The commissioning section covers detector commissioning, repeatability and reproducibility, baseline and tolerance setting, concordance with existing QC, sensitivity testing, cost-benefits analysis, and risk assessment methods. In order to offer practical guidance, case studies covering each aspect of commissioning are included. They are real-world examples or experiences from early adopters, each applied to a different example MIQC system. The examples will be directly applicable to users of that specific MIQC system, but also provide practical guidance on clinical implementation to users of the other systems.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(8)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), St Thomas' Hospital (GB), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Western General Hospital (GB), Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), London Clinic (GB), James Cook University Hospital (GB), Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB), St. Thomas Hospital (CA), Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.