Development and Validation of the Psychological Abuse in Relationships Scale

Psychological abuse within intimate relationships is a highly prevalent subtype of intimate partner violence (IPV) that is frequently associated with other types of IPV such as sexual or physical violence. Psychological abuse can cause enduring harm, including the loss of agency and self-belief, and entrapment in a relationship. Previous measures of psychological abuse have been characterized by inconsistencies in conceptualization and measurement contributing to problems in identifying its prevalence, impact, and patterns. To address many of the existing challenges and gaps, we developed a new measure of psychological abuse, building upon scale development work to date, and in consultation with lived experience and academic experts. A sample of 765 adult women in Australia completed our survey of 31 psychologically abusive behaviors to establish reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of psychological abuse victimization and impact. <i>Exploratory factor analysis</i> generated a scale comprising 20 items and four factors-Severe Psychological Abuse, Coercive Emotional Abuse, Restrictive Isolating Abuse, and Financial Abuse-with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.73 to 0.85 and overall explained variance of 57.2%. Exhibiting evidence of validity and reliability, the Psychological Abuse in Relationships Scale is a contemporary, concise, and comprehensive measure of psychological IPV that will improve the ability of researchers to identify this common and harmful type of abuse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251325912
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of the Psychological Abuse in Relationships Scale

Kelsey Lee Hegarty, Cynthia Brown, Mandy McKenzie, Laura Tarzia et al.
1 citations
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
2.17
article

Development and Validation of the Psychological Abuse in Relationships Scale

Kelsey Lee Hegarty, Cynthia Brown, Mandy McKenzie, Laura Tarzia, Elizabeth McLindon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Psychological abuse within intimate relationships is a highly prevalent subtype of intimate partner violence (IPV) that is frequently associated with other types of IPV such as sexual or physical violence. Psychological abuse can cause enduring harm, including the loss of agency and self-belief, and entrapment in a relationship. Previous measures of psychological abuse have been characterized by inconsistencies in conceptualization and measurement contributing to problems in identifying its prevalence, impact, and patterns. To address many of the existing challenges and gaps, we developed a new measure of psychological abuse, building upon scale development work to date, and in consultation with lived experience and academic experts. A sample of 765 adult women in Australia completed our survey of 31 psychologically abusive behaviors to establish reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of psychological abuse victimization and impact. <i>Exploratory factor analysis</i> generated a scale comprising 20 items and four factors-Severe Psychological Abuse, Coercive Emotional Abuse, Restrictive Isolating Abuse, and Financial Abuse-with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.73 to 0.85 and overall explained variance of 57.2%. Exhibiting evidence of validity and reliability, the Psychological Abuse in Relationships Scale is a contemporary, concise, and comprehensive measure of psychological IPV that will improve the ability of researchers to identify this common and harmful type of abuse.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Royal Women's Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU)
Oak Foundation
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.