Advocating for collaboration among key partners to promote diversity in clinical studies amid policy challenges in the United States of America

The lack of diversity in clinical studies has significant ethical and health consequences, limiting the development of effective treatments for diverse populations. Homogeneous participation in clinical studies contributes to health disparities, particularly among historically underrepresented groups in the United States (US). Racial, ethnic, and other minoritized populations have long been excluded from clinical research. In response, the US Congress mandated the National Institutes of Health to assess the impacts of insufficient diversity in clinical studies. Despite efforts by the government, non-profit organizations, and industry players to improve diversity in clinical studies, progress has been slow due to fragmented approaches. For instance, the new US administration (2025) has recently released executive orders which threaten to reverse the progress made in inclusive clinical research. The Stanford Think Tank on Diversity and Equity in Clinical Trials, held in September 2023, brought together key partners across multiple sectors and professions to discuss barriers and explore potential solutions to participation in clinical studies. In this commentary, we discuss the importance of collaborative, inclusive strategies in clinical study design to advance equitable health outcomes for all. Further, we discuss potential implications of the government's dismissal of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives on diverse research participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08820-y
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advocating for collaboration among key partners to promote diversity in clinical studies amid policy challenges in the United States of America

William E. Rosa, Evans M. Whitaker, Latha Palaniappan, Samuel Byiringiro et al.
6 citations
Trials
Ethics in Clinical Research
11.27
article

Advocating for collaboration among key partners to promote diversity in clinical studies amid policy challenges in the United States of America

William E. Rosa, Evans M. Whitaker, Latha Palaniappan, Samuel Byiringiro, Eldrin F. Lewis, Fátima Rodríguez, Erin D. Michos, Barbara E. Bierer, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Stéphan Busque, Paul J. Wang, Rifath Ara Alam Barsha, Hannah A. Valantine, Nicholas Farrell, Jorge García, Koen De Lombaert, Hailey Miller, Bunmi Ogungbe, Maya Berdichesky
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The lack of diversity in clinical studies has significant ethical and health consequences, limiting the development of effective treatments for diverse populations. Homogeneous participation in clinical studies contributes to health disparities, particularly among historically underrepresented groups in the United States (US). Racial, ethnic, and other minoritized populations have long been excluded from clinical research. In response, the US Congress mandated the National Institutes of Health to assess the impacts of insufficient diversity in clinical studies. Despite efforts by the government, non-profit organizations, and industry players to improve diversity in clinical studies, progress has been slow due to fragmented approaches. For instance, the new US administration (2025) has recently released executive orders which threaten to reverse the progress made in inclusive clinical research. The Stanford Think Tank on Diversity and Equity in Clinical Trials, held in September 2023, brought together key partners across multiple sectors and professions to discuss barriers and explore potential solutions to participation in clinical studies. In this commentary, we discuss the importance of collaborative, inclusive strategies in clinical study design to advance equitable health outcomes for all. Further, we discuss potential implications of the government's dismissal of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives on diverse research participation.

TrialsVol. 26(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Washington State University Spokane (US), Palo Alto University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of San Francisco (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Philadelphia University (US), Stanford University (US), Georgia Highlands College (US)
American Heart Association, National Institutes of Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics in Clinical Research
11.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.