Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys
Estimating detection bias and false negative rates for tick surveillance methods such as tick drags will be important for accurately evaluating tick-borne disease risk across space and into the future. We found scent detection dogs to be a reasonable alternative sampling approach to consider when ticks are at low abundance or patchily distributed such as during tick range expansion or novel invasions. Scent detection dogs may also be useful for sampling for ticks in areas or along surfaces that are difficult to sample with the traditional tick drag technique like at ports of entry or livestock competitions.
Authors
- Laura M. Thompson
- Troy M. Koser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-6888)
- Benjamin Wise
- Paul C. Cross (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8045-5213)
- Alyson B. Courtemanch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7405-7657)
- Aimee Hurt
Institutions
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Montana State University (US)
- Wyoming Game and Fish Department (US)
- University of Montana (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Parasites & Vectors
- Published
- 2025-04-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06519-8
- Primary Topic
- Vector-borne infectious diseases
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Wyoming
- Montana State University
- U.S. Geological Survey
- National Park Service