It’s Just a Little High: Testing the Effect of the Legalization of Marijuana on Voters’ Behaviour in Canada

A fundamental question about voting behaviour is whether voters lead parties and politicians by judging them on the ground of their issue stands, or whether they instead align their views to match those of the party and politicians they favour. The recent legalization of marijuana in Canada offers an opportunity to untangle this causal knot. This paper makes use of panel data collected during the 2011 and 2015 Canadian elections to test whether voters direct their support towards parties and politicians in line with their prior issue preferences or whether, on the opposite, voters bend their issue preferences to match their partisan affiliation. Results provide evidence for the independent effect of the legalization of marijuana on voters’ behaviour towards the Liberal Party. More generally, this makes for a striking case of the effect of an easy, positional issue and contributes to the longstanding debate on issue voting in Canadian politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Political Science Review
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/20241840
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It’s Just a Little High: Testing the Effect of the Legalization of Marijuana on Voters’ Behaviour in Canada

Yannick Dufresne, Catherine Ouellet, Alexis Bibeau-Gagnon
Canadian Political Science Review
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

It’s Just a Little High: Testing the Effect of the Legalization of Marijuana on Voters’ Behaviour in Canada

Yannick Dufresne, Catherine Ouellet, Alexis Bibeau-Gagnon
article en

Abstract

A fundamental question about voting behaviour is whether voters lead parties and politicians by judging them on the ground of their issue stands, or whether they instead align their views to match those of the party and politicians they favour. The recent legalization of marijuana in Canada offers an opportunity to untangle this causal knot. This paper makes use of panel data collected during the 2011 and 2015 Canadian elections to test whether voters direct their support towards parties and politicians in line with their prior issue preferences or whether, on the opposite, voters bend their issue preferences to match their partisan affiliation. Results provide evidence for the independent effect of the legalization of marijuana on voters’ behaviour towards the Liberal Party. More generally, this makes for a striking case of the effect of an easy, positional issue and contributes to the longstanding debate on issue voting in Canadian politics.

Canadian Political Science ReviewVol. 18(1)
Université Laval (CA), University of Virginia (US), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

It’s Just a Little High: Testing the Effect of the Legalization of Marijuana on Voters’ Behaviour in Canada — Yannick Dufresne, Catherine Ouellet, et al. · Canadian Political Science Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS