An External, Independent Validation of an<i>O</i>-(2-[<sup>18</sup>F]Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine PET Automatic Segmentation Network on a Single-Center, Prospective Dataset of Patients with Glioblastoma
The goal of this study was to conduct an external, independent validation of an <i>O</i>-(2-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([<sup>18</sup>F]FET) PET automatic segmentation network on a cohort of patients with glioblastoma. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-four patients with glioblastoma were included in this study who underwent a total of 52 [<sup>18</sup>F]FET PET scans (preradiotherapy, <i>n</i> = 23; preradiotherapy retest, <i>n</i> = 9; follow-up, <i>n</i> = 20). Biologic tumor volume (BTV) delineation was performed by an expert nuclear medicine physician and an automatic segmentation network. Physician and automated quantitative metrics (BTV, mean tumor-to-background ratio [TBR<sub>mean</sub>], lesion SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and background SUV<sub>mean</sub>) were assessed with Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis (bias, limits of agreement [LoA]). Automated and physician segmentation overlap was assessed with spatial and distance-based metrics. <b>Results:</b> BTV and TBR<sub>mean</sub> Pearson correlation was excellent for all time points (range, 0.92-0.98). In 2 patients with frontal lobe lesions, the network segmented the transverse sinus. Bland-Altman analysis showed network underestimation of physician-derived BTVs (absolute bias, 2.7 cm<sup>3</sup>, LoA, -13.1-18.5 cm<sup>3</sup>; relative bias, 27.9%, LoA, -95.3%-151.2%) and deviations for TBR<sub>mean</sub> were small (absolute bias, 0.03, LoA, -0.25-0.30; relative bias, 0.83%, LoA -14.27%-15.93%). Median Dice similarity coefficient, surface Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance, and mean absolute surface distance were 0.83, 0.95, 10.94 mm, 3.62 mm, and 0.88 mm, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Automated quantitative analysis was highly correlated with physician assessment; however, volume underestimation and erroneous segmentations may impact radiotherapy treatment planning and response assessment. Further training on a representative local dataset would likely be required for multicenter implementation.
Authors
- Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- Nathaniel Barry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9009-5909)
- Eng‐Siew Koh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-2513)
- Ghulam Mubashar Hassan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6636-8807)
- Roslyn J. Francis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6256-1351)
- Robin Gutsche
- Norbert Galldiks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-1796)
- Jake Kendrick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6524-539X)
- Nicholas Bucknell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-9120)
- Karl‐Josef Langen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-5075)
- Martin A. Ebert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6875-0719)
- Andrew Mark Scott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-295X)
- Philipp Lohmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5360-046X)
- Keith George Ciantar
Institutions
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU)
- Liverpool Hospital (AU)
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Integrated Oncology (United States) (US)
- Centre for Cancer Biology (AU)
- University Hospital Cologne (DE)
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre (AU)
- Western Australian Marine Science Institution (AU)
- Austin Health (AU)
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2025-04-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268925
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.88