Different sources of DHA have distinct effects on the ruminal fatty acid profile and microbiota in vitro

The primary commercial sources for docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6) are fish oil (FO) and Schizochytrium sp. (SZ). This study aimed to assess how SZ and FO, along with SZ oil (SZO) and pure DHA (pDHA) influence rumen fermentation characteristics, microbiota, and fatty acid profiles in vitro when used at the same concentration. Furthermore, we investigated their effects on microbial protein synthesis. Notably, NH 3 -N concentration and pH value remained unaffected by the different DHA sources. However, SZ ( P < 0.01) and SZO ( P < 0.01) enhanced microbial crude protein synthesis compared to the control group (CON). Additionally, pDHA reduced the concentration of total volatile fatty acids (VFA) compared to the other non-pure DHA sources ( P < 0.01). The content of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) and C22:6 was higher in SZ ( P < 0.01) but lower ( P < 0.01) in pDHA compared to the other treatments. No difference in C22:6 or BCFA production was observed between SZO and FO. Metataxonomic analysis revealed that all DHA treatments led to a lower relative abundance of Firmicutes ( P < 0.01) and a higher relative abundance of Bacteroidota ( P < 0.05), Proteobacteria ( P < 0.01), and Verrucomicrobia ( P < 0.01) compared to CON. Furthermore, the content of C22:6 positively correlated with the relative abundance of the genus Anaerovibrio ( P < 0.01, R 2 = 0.54) but negatively correlated with the relative abundance of the genus WCHB1- 41 ( P < 0.01, R 2 = - 0.60). In summary, Schizochytrium sp. powder outperforms DHA-rich oils in enhancing C22:6 and BCFA concentrations in the in vitro rumen fermentation, suggesting its potential for improving dairy production, though further in vivo studies are needed to confirm these benefits. • Schizochytrium sp. powder uniquely enhances ruminal DHA and BCFA levels compared to oil-based sources. • Ruminal C22:6 content positively correlates with the relative abundance of the genus Anaerovibrio. • Compared to oil-based DHA sources, Schizochytrium sp. powder significantly increases ruminal BCFA and C22:6 contents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101875
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different sources of DHA have distinct effects on the ruminal fatty acid profile and microbiota in vitro

Zhongtang Yu, Yisha Liu, Jade L. L. Teng, Jun Ding et al.
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Different sources of DHA have distinct effects on the ruminal fatty acid profile and microbiota in vitro

Zhongtang Yu, Yisha Liu, Jade L. L. Teng, Jun Ding, Lu Ma, Tengfei Zhan, Dengpan Bu
article en

Abstract

The primary commercial sources for docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6) are fish oil (FO) and Schizochytrium sp. (SZ). This study aimed to assess how SZ and FO, along with SZ oil (SZO) and pure DHA (pDHA) influence rumen fermentation characteristics, microbiota, and fatty acid profiles in vitro when used at the same concentration. Furthermore, we investigated their effects on microbial protein synthesis. Notably, NH 3 -N concentration and pH value remained unaffected by the different DHA sources. However, SZ ( P < 0.01) and SZO ( P < 0.01) enhanced microbial crude protein synthesis compared to the control group (CON). Additionally, pDHA reduced the concentration of total volatile fatty acids (VFA) compared to the other non-pure DHA sources ( P < 0.01). The content of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) and C22:6 was higher in SZ ( P < 0.01) but lower ( P < 0.01) in pDHA compared to the other treatments. No difference in C22:6 or BCFA production was observed between SZO and FO. Metataxonomic analysis revealed that all DHA treatments led to a lower relative abundance of Firmicutes ( P < 0.01) and a higher relative abundance of Bacteroidota ( P < 0.05), Proteobacteria ( P < 0.01), and Verrucomicrobia ( P < 0.01) compared to CON. Furthermore, the content of C22:6 positively correlated with the relative abundance of the genus Anaerovibrio ( P < 0.01, R 2 = 0.54) but negatively correlated with the relative abundance of the genus WCHB1- 41 ( P < 0.01, R 2 = - 0.60). In summary, Schizochytrium sp. powder outperforms DHA-rich oils in enhancing C22:6 and BCFA concentrations in the in vitro rumen fermentation, suggesting its potential for improving dairy production, though further in vivo studies are needed to confirm these benefits. • Schizochytrium sp. powder uniquely enhances ruminal DHA and BCFA levels compared to oil-based sources. • Ruminal C22:6 content positively correlates with the relative abundance of the genus Anaerovibrio. • Compared to oil-based DHA sources, Schizochytrium sp. powder significantly increases ruminal BCFA and C22:6 contents.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 21
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), The Ohio State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.