Examining the role of social contact and loneliness in linking intimate partner violence and internalizing distress

• A single-factor model best explained the CASR-SF with excellent internal reliability. • There was a direct effect from IPV to higher levels of internalizing distress. • Loneliness partially accounted for the association between IPV and internalizing distress. • Therefore reducing loneliness may be an important clinical objective. Low social support is a well-established risk factor for mental health problems among survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV). Social support includes elements of social contact and loneliness, and in this study, we examined the specific roles social contact and loneliness play in explaining the association between IPV and internalizing distress. We also assessed the psychometric properties of the Composite Abuse Scale Short Form (CASR-SF), a relatively new measure of IPV. Participants ( N = 353) were male and female adults living in Ireland with a lifetime history of IPV. The psychometric properties of the CASR-SF were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and composite reliability analysis. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to determine if social contact and loneliness fully or partial accounted for the association between IPV and internalizing distress. The CASR-SF was best explained by a single-factor model that fitted the data well, and had excellent internal reliability (ω = 0.97). The SEM results indicated that there was a direct association between IPV and internalizing distress (β = 0.32), and this association was partially mediated by loneliness (β = 0.06) but not social contact. The CASR-SF operated well as a measure of IPV in this sample, and subjective assessments of the quality and quantity of social interactions (loneliness) was more important than the number of social interactions (social contact) in accounting for the association between IPV and internalizing distress. Reducing loneliness may therefore be an important clinical objective in helping survivors of IPV with mental health problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100915
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the role of social contact and loneliness in linking intimate partner violence and internalizing distress

Philip Hyland, Natasha Joksimovic, Frédérique Vallières
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Examining the role of social contact and loneliness in linking intimate partner violence and internalizing distress

Philip Hyland, Natasha Joksimovic, Frédérique Vallières
article en

Abstract

• A single-factor model best explained the CASR-SF with excellent internal reliability. • There was a direct effect from IPV to higher levels of internalizing distress. • Loneliness partially accounted for the association between IPV and internalizing distress. • Therefore reducing loneliness may be an important clinical objective. Low social support is a well-established risk factor for mental health problems among survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV). Social support includes elements of social contact and loneliness, and in this study, we examined the specific roles social contact and loneliness play in explaining the association between IPV and internalizing distress. We also assessed the psychometric properties of the Composite Abuse Scale Short Form (CASR-SF), a relatively new measure of IPV. Participants ( N = 353) were male and female adults living in Ireland with a lifetime history of IPV. The psychometric properties of the CASR-SF were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and composite reliability analysis. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to determine if social contact and loneliness fully or partial accounted for the association between IPV and internalizing distress. The CASR-SF was best explained by a single-factor model that fitted the data well, and had excellent internal reliability (ω = 0.97). The SEM results indicated that there was a direct association between IPV and internalizing distress (β = 0.32), and this association was partially mediated by loneliness (β = 0.06) but not social contact. The CASR-SF operated well as a measure of IPV in this sample, and subjective assessments of the quality and quantity of social interactions (loneliness) was more important than the number of social interactions (social contact) in accounting for the association between IPV and internalizing distress. Reducing loneliness may therefore be an important clinical objective in helping survivors of IPV with mental health problems.

Journal of Affective Disorders ReportsVol. 20
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.