Recognizing Supporting Standpoints for Online Restaurant Reviews: Evidence From Tripadvisor

This article presents a practical framework that analyzes a real dataset from Tripadvisor with 2330 restaurant reviews. The reviews are written in English, and the structure of the reviews is free, not following any specific form. We conducted four experiments that exploited different artificial intelligence models and natural language processing systems. Our results indicate that an online restaurant review often shares several standpoints with another review of the same restaurant. Our results also illustrate that the number of agreed standpoints between reviews is not related to the rating of the respective reviews. Likewise, the results imply that the pattern of variation in the number of reviews (identified as supported with a specific evidence intensity) is unrelated to the reviews’ rating, where ‘‘evidence intensity’’ refers to the number of shared standpoints between a review and its supporter review. Additionally, if a restaurant review is found unsupported, the cause is mainly related to how the review was structured and written. Our framework can be utilized by online review platforms, such as Tripadvisor, to accredit or rank reviews based on supporting evidence from other related reviews.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3557526
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognizing Supporting Standpoints for Online Restaurant Reviews: Evidence From Tripadvisor

Samer Nofal
IEEE Access
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

Recognizing Supporting Standpoints for Online Restaurant Reviews: Evidence From Tripadvisor

Samer Nofal
article en

Abstract

This article presents a practical framework that analyzes a real dataset from Tripadvisor with 2330 restaurant reviews. The reviews are written in English, and the structure of the reviews is free, not following any specific form. We conducted four experiments that exploited different artificial intelligence models and natural language processing systems. Our results indicate that an online restaurant review often shares several standpoints with another review of the same restaurant. Our results also illustrate that the number of agreed standpoints between reviews is not related to the rating of the respective reviews. Likewise, the results imply that the pattern of variation in the number of reviews (identified as supported with a specific evidence intensity) is unrelated to the reviews’ rating, where ‘‘evidence intensity’’ refers to the number of shared standpoints between a review and its supporter review. Additionally, if a restaurant review is found unsupported, the cause is mainly related to how the review was structured and written. Our framework can be utilized by online review platforms, such as Tripadvisor, to accredit or rank reviews based on supporting evidence from other related reviews.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
German Jordanian University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.