Unraveling Nanofertilizers' Influence on Soil Microbial Communities in Mustard‐Pearl Millet Cropping Systems

ABSTRACT Nanofertilization is becoming increasingly popular in global agriculture for enhancing crop productivity. Nevertheless, its influence on soil microbial composition is still not well comprehended. This research endeavors to evaluate the effects of combining nano and traditional fertilizers (conventional practice) on essential soil biological parameters and the yield of mustard and pearl millet crops. The results indicated that applying 75% of the recommended nitrogen alongside the full dose of phosphorus and potassium with conventional fertilizers, along with nano urea (nano‐N) or nano urea and nano Zinc (Nano‐N + Nano‐Zn) sprays (N 75 PK + nano‐N or N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn), led to comparable grain yields over the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) in mustard and pearl millet crops. Specifically, mustard yielded 2.21 t ha −1 under N 75 PK + nano‐N and 2.29 t ha −1 under N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn, while pearl millet produced 3.27 t ha −1 under N 75 PK + nano‐N and 3.32 t ha −1 under N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn. The application of N 75 PK + nano‐N (with dehydrogenase activities of 39.9 μg TPF g −1 for mustard and 38.5 μg TPF g −1 for pearl millet) or N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn (with dehydrogenase activities of 34.6 μg g −1 for mustard and 37.3 μg g −1 for pearl millet) resulted in dehydrogenase activities similar to those observed with the RDF, which were 38.1 μg g −1 for mustard and 39.5 μg g −1 for pearl millet. The application of nanofertilizers enhanced microbial diversity, especially promoting Actinobacteriota at the phylum level, which were predominant under N 75 PK + nano‐N (MU 5 ) and N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn (MU 6 ) treatments. This suggests a potential shift toward beneficial microbial communities, improving soil functional diversity. The combined approach also increased beneficial microorganisms, contributing to soil biological health. Furthermore, nanofertilizers facilitated enhanced crop‐microbe‐soil interactions by supporting beneficial microbial populations, thereby improving nutrient cycling and crop productivity. This indicates that the application of nanofertilizers through foliar spray with 75% N through urea represents a sustainable method concerning both crop yield and soil biological functions. Overall, the findings of this study advocate for a balanced integration of conventional and nanofertilizers for enhanced productivity, soil fertility, and microbial diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5609
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling Nanofertilizers' Influence on Soil Microbial Communities in Mustard‐Pearl Millet Cropping Systems

Anjali Patel, Vinod Kumar Singh, Meenakshi Rangot, Sanjay Singh Rathore et al.
4 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
4.74
article

Unraveling Nanofertilizers' Influence on Soil Microbial Communities in Mustard‐Pearl Millet Cropping Systems

Anjali Patel, Vinod Kumar Singh, Meenakshi Rangot, Sanjay Singh Rathore, Rajiv Kumar Singh, Kapila Shekhawat, Pravin Kumar Upadhyay, Abir Dey, Dwijesh Chandra Mishra, G. A. Rajanna, Neeraj Budhlakoti, Nalini Kanta Choudhury, B. S. Dwivedi, Subhash Babu, Dr Pradeep Kumar, Gaurav Shukla
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nanofertilization is becoming increasingly popular in global agriculture for enhancing crop productivity. Nevertheless, its influence on soil microbial composition is still not well comprehended. This research endeavors to evaluate the effects of combining nano and traditional fertilizers (conventional practice) on essential soil biological parameters and the yield of mustard and pearl millet crops. The results indicated that applying 75% of the recommended nitrogen alongside the full dose of phosphorus and potassium with conventional fertilizers, along with nano urea (nano‐N) or nano urea and nano Zinc (Nano‐N + Nano‐Zn) sprays (N 75 PK + nano‐N or N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn), led to comparable grain yields over the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) in mustard and pearl millet crops. Specifically, mustard yielded 2.21 t ha −1 under N 75 PK + nano‐N and 2.29 t ha −1 under N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn, while pearl millet produced 3.27 t ha −1 under N 75 PK + nano‐N and 3.32 t ha −1 under N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn. The application of N 75 PK + nano‐N (with dehydrogenase activities of 39.9 μg TPF g −1 for mustard and 38.5 μg TPF g −1 for pearl millet) or N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn (with dehydrogenase activities of 34.6 μg g −1 for mustard and 37.3 μg g −1 for pearl millet) resulted in dehydrogenase activities similar to those observed with the RDF, which were 38.1 μg g −1 for mustard and 39.5 μg g −1 for pearl millet. The application of nanofertilizers enhanced microbial diversity, especially promoting Actinobacteriota at the phylum level, which were predominant under N 75 PK + nano‐N (MU 5 ) and N 75 PK + nano‐N + nano‐Zn (MU 6 ) treatments. This suggests a potential shift toward beneficial microbial communities, improving soil functional diversity. The combined approach also increased beneficial microorganisms, contributing to soil biological health. Furthermore, nanofertilizers facilitated enhanced crop‐microbe‐soil interactions by supporting beneficial microbial populations, thereby improving nutrient cycling and crop productivity. This indicates that the application of nanofertilizers through foliar spray with 75% N through urea represents a sustainable method concerning both crop yield and soil biological functions. Overall, the findings of this study advocate for a balanced integration of conventional and nanofertilizers for enhanced productivity, soil fertility, and microbial diversity.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 36(11)
Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (IN), Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (IN), Directorate of Groundnut Research (IN), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
4.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.