Empowering Community Knowledge: A Qualitative Examination of Knowledge Mobilization Barriers Involving Community-Based Organizations

This study investigates the potential of community-based organizations (CBOs) to enhance knowledge mobilization (KMb) through reciprocal and empowering collaborations with academic researchers. Using a constructivist qualitative methodology, the research explored how CBOs perceive and experience KMb relationships and identified challenges in fostering mutually beneficial KMb relationships. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with 11 participants from nine Montréal-based CBOs. Findings indicate that CBOs distinguish between direct service beneficiaries and academic collaborators, often prioritizing immediate community needs over KMb objectives. They face resource deficits, siloed practices, and complex decision-making; participants also noted a lack of recognition and ownership of contributions that are frequently undocumented and undervalued. The study advocates a more inclusive, reciprocal KMb framework that fully recognizes CBOs’ local knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2025v21n1a1443
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering Community Knowledge: A Qualitative Examination of Knowledge Mobilization Barriers Involving Community-Based Organizations

Blane Harvey, Hamid Golhasany, Ollivier Prigent
1 citations
International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership
Knowledge Management and Sharing
3.86
article

Empowering Community Knowledge: A Qualitative Examination of Knowledge Mobilization Barriers Involving Community-Based Organizations

Blane Harvey, Hamid Golhasany, Ollivier Prigent
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of community-based organizations (CBOs) to enhance knowledge mobilization (KMb) through reciprocal and empowering collaborations with academic researchers. Using a constructivist qualitative methodology, the research explored how CBOs perceive and experience KMb relationships and identified challenges in fostering mutually beneficial KMb relationships. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with 11 participants from nine Montréal-based CBOs. Findings indicate that CBOs distinguish between direct service beneficiaries and academic collaborators, often prioritizing immediate community needs over KMb objectives. They face resource deficits, siloed practices, and complex decision-making; participants also noted a lack of recognition and ownership of contributions that are frequently undocumented and undervalued. The study advocates a more inclusive, reciprocal KMb framework that fully recognizes CBOs’ local knowledge.

International Journal of Education Policy and LeadershipVol. 21(1)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.