Intraspecific variation in plant–soil feedback depends on plant dominance while interspecific variation is unrelated to plant community structure

Abstract Plants interact with a variety of soil biota; the accumulation of which can affect their growth and that of subsequent plants. This plant–soil feedback (PSF) can both positively and negatively affect plant populations. Diverse plant communities should dilute pathogens and increase beneficial soil biota, which can mitigate negative PSF. Plant dominance, conversely, should result in reduced microbial diversity and increased pathogens or mutualists of the dominant plant, enhancing negative or positive PSF. Genetic diversity within the dominant species may dilute PSF, yet it is unclear whether species and genetic diversity can have additive effects. Using field‐conditioned soils from Medicago sativa production systems varying in dominance and species diversity, we inoculated multiple plant species and Medicago cultivars to assess effects on PSF. In the field, we measured multiple aspects of the biotic and abiotic environment, including sequencing bacteria, fungi, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and oomycetes. Using structural equation modelling, we linked the dominance and diversity of the plant community to intraspecific and interspecific (community‐wide) means and variances in PSF via changes in microbiome community composition and diversity. Intraspecific PSF was more negative and variable as Medicago dominance increased, whereas the mean and variance in interspecific PSF were largely unlinked to plant composition. While the microbiome was strongly linked to both the mean and variance of intra‐ and interspecific PSF, only the oomycete community had similar effects within and among species, suggesting they are important generalist pathogens and drivers of plant population and community dynamics. Nonetheless, each microbiome component was linked to the mean PSF of either the community or Medicago. The diversity of the eukaryotic microbiome, however, was more important for determining variability in PSF within and among species. Synthesis . Plant dominance had stronger effects on microbiome assembly and plant–soil feedback (PSF) than plant diversity. Although plant diversity did not reduce negative PSF, independent variation in PSF within and among species suggests additive benefits of genetic and species diversity for dilution of plant responses to pathogens. Understanding this variation, however, requires quantifying microbiome components beyond bacteria and fungi.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70034
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraspecific variation in plant–soil feedback depends on plant dominance while interspecific variation is unrelated to plant community structure

Jonathan Bennett, Luke D. Bainard, Julien Tremblay, Stephen O. Awodele
2 citations
Journal of Ecology
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
3.50
article

Intraspecific variation in plant–soil feedback depends on plant dominance while interspecific variation is unrelated to plant community structure

Jonathan Bennett, Luke D. Bainard, Julien Tremblay, Stephen O. Awodele
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Plants interact with a variety of soil biota; the accumulation of which can affect their growth and that of subsequent plants. This plant–soil feedback (PSF) can both positively and negatively affect plant populations. Diverse plant communities should dilute pathogens and increase beneficial soil biota, which can mitigate negative PSF. Plant dominance, conversely, should result in reduced microbial diversity and increased pathogens or mutualists of the dominant plant, enhancing negative or positive PSF. Genetic diversity within the dominant species may dilute PSF, yet it is unclear whether species and genetic diversity can have additive effects. Using field‐conditioned soils from Medicago sativa production systems varying in dominance and species diversity, we inoculated multiple plant species and Medicago cultivars to assess effects on PSF. In the field, we measured multiple aspects of the biotic and abiotic environment, including sequencing bacteria, fungi, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and oomycetes. Using structural equation modelling, we linked the dominance and diversity of the plant community to intraspecific and interspecific (community‐wide) means and variances in PSF via changes in microbiome community composition and diversity. Intraspecific PSF was more negative and variable as Medicago dominance increased, whereas the mean and variance in interspecific PSF were largely unlinked to plant composition. While the microbiome was strongly linked to both the mean and variance of intra‐ and interspecific PSF, only the oomycete community had similar effects within and among species, suggesting they are important generalist pathogens and drivers of plant population and community dynamics. Nonetheless, each microbiome component was linked to the mean PSF of either the community or Medicago. The diversity of the eukaryotic microbiome, however, was more important for determining variability in PSF within and among species. Synthesis . Plant dominance had stronger effects on microbiome assembly and plant–soil feedback (PSF) than plant diversity. Although plant diversity did not reduce negative PSF, independent variation in PSF within and among species suggests additive benefits of genetic and species diversity for dilution of plant responses to pathogens. Understanding this variation, however, requires quantifying microbiome components beyond bacteria and fungi.

Journal of EcologyVol. 113(5)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.