Individualized Cardiac Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Chronic Heart Failure

Objective: To study the changes and clinical effects of elderly patients with coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure after applying individualized cardiac rehabilitation. Methods: 85 cases of elderly patients with coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure admitted from June 2023 to May 2024 were divided into the control group (42 cases) and the experimental group (43 cases), and were given conventional rehabilitation guidance and individualized cardiac rehabilitation training programme respectively, comparing the indexes of exercise endurance, level of cardiac function, quality of life, and incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the two groups. Results: Before intervention, the LVEF, LVEDD and LVEDS of the control group and the experimental group were (37.11 ± 3.96)%, (62.15 ± 4.06) mm and (45.75 ± 4.33) mm and (37.06 ± 3.92)%, (2.20 ± 4.23) mm and (45.81 ± 4.27) mm, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. and test group LVEF increased and LVEDD and LVESD decreased by (45.75 ± 5.12)%, (55.18 ± 3.97) mm, (41.14 ± 3.29) mm and (51.79 ± 4.26)%, (48.23 ± 3.58) mm, (36.62 ± 3.75) mm, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05) ). Before intervention, the 6 min walk test (6MWT) and maximum exercise load of the control group and the experimental group were (325.55 ± 37.79) m, (91.02 ± 15.74) W and (324.17 ± 37.68) m, (90.92 ± 14.78) W, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). After intervention, all the indicators of both groups were significant (P > 0.05). After the intervention, all indicators in both groups were significantly higher, respectively (386.28 ± 42.95) m, (135.67 ± 22.75) W and (460.43 ± 39.91) m, (152.83 ± 25.64) W, and the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P < 0.05). The quality of life scores of the experimental group on somatic symptoms, daily activities, psychological quality, and social functioning were respectively (80.01 ± 6.02), (73.75 ± 7.32), (80.56 ± 6.41), (71.42 ± 6.87), significantly higher than the control group’s (67.03 ± 6.98), (64.19 ± 7.16), (63.78 ± 6.13) and (60.72 ± 6.47), while the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Cardiac arrhythmia occurred in the experimental group. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction was 4.65%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (23.81%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Individualized cardiac rehabilitation exercise in elderly patients with coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure can promote the recovery of clinical symptoms, improve cardiorespiratory function, enhance exercise endurance, improve the quality of life, and effectively improve the prognosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiovascular Reviews
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26689/cr.v3i1.10056
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individualized Cardiac Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Chronic Heart Failure

Xinxin Cao, Shanshan Cui, Fangyang Jiao, Huanping Zhang et al.
Cardiovascular Reviews
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Individualized Cardiac Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Chronic Heart Failure

Xinxin Cao, Shanshan Cui, Fangyang Jiao, Huanping Zhang, Wenwen Li, Xiaojiao Li
article en

Abstract

Objective: To study the changes and clinical effects of elderly patients with coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure after applying individualized cardiac rehabilitation. Methods: 85 cases of elderly patients with coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure admitted from June 2023 to May 2024 were divided into the control group (42 cases) and the experimental group (43 cases), and were given conventional rehabilitation guidance and individualized cardiac rehabilitation training programme respectively, comparing the indexes of exercise endurance, level of cardiac function, quality of life, and incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the two groups. Results: Before intervention, the LVEF, LVEDD and LVEDS of the control group and the experimental group were (37.11 ± 3.96)%, (62.15 ± 4.06) mm and (45.75 ± 4.33) mm and (37.06 ± 3.92)%, (2.20 ± 4.23) mm and (45.81 ± 4.27) mm, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. and test group LVEF increased and LVEDD and LVESD decreased by (45.75 ± 5.12)%, (55.18 ± 3.97) mm, (41.14 ± 3.29) mm and (51.79 ± 4.26)%, (48.23 ± 3.58) mm, (36.62 ± 3.75) mm, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05) ). Before intervention, the 6 min walk test (6MWT) and maximum exercise load of the control group and the experimental group were (325.55 ± 37.79) m, (91.02 ± 15.74) W and (324.17 ± 37.68) m, (90.92 ± 14.78) W, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). After intervention, all the indicators of both groups were significant (P > 0.05). After the intervention, all indicators in both groups were significantly higher, respectively (386.28 ± 42.95) m, (135.67 ± 22.75) W and (460.43 ± 39.91) m, (152.83 ± 25.64) W, and the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P < 0.05). The quality of life scores of the experimental group on somatic symptoms, daily activities, psychological quality, and social functioning were respectively (80.01 ± 6.02), (73.75 ± 7.32), (80.56 ± 6.41), (71.42 ± 6.87), significantly higher than the control group’s (67.03 ± 6.98), (64.19 ± 7.16), (63.78 ± 6.13) and (60.72 ± 6.47), while the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Cardiac arrhythmia occurred in the experimental group. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction was 4.65%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (23.81%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Individualized cardiac rehabilitation exercise in elderly patients with coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure can promote the recovery of clinical symptoms, improve cardiorespiratory function, enhance exercise endurance, improve the quality of life, and effectively improve the prognosis.

Cardiovascular ReviewsVol. 3(1)
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.