Comparison of Hysteroscopy Findings and Outcomes between Pre-in vitro- fertilization (IVF) and Non-IVF Women with Infertility

A bstract Introduction: Hysteroscopy remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of endometrial pathologies; however, the benefit of routine hysteroscopy before in vitro -fertilization (IVF) is controversial. Objectives: To compare findings between pre-IVF and non-IVF patients and also to determine the benefit of routine hysteroscopy before a first IVF cycle. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of hysteroscopy procedures was performed between 2019 and 2023. The case records of 101 patients, 60 pre-IVF (cases) and 41 non-IVF (controls), were extracted using a proforma designed by the authors. The independent-sample t test was used to compare the means of groups studied, while the chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The pre-IVF patients had undergone significantly more diagnostic procedures ( P = 0.001), combinations of hysteroscopy with laparoscopy ( P = 0.011) and findings with potential to improve the IVF outcomes ( P = 0.007) when compared to the non-IVF patients. The repeat IVF patients had significantly more endometrial pathologies ( P = 0.019, OR = 3.64, CI = 1.23–10.73) and requirement for operative procedures ( P = 0.012, OR = 2.16, CI = 1.08–4.33), compared to the first cycle IVF patients. The duration of hysteroscopy ( P = 0.170), intraoperative complications ( P = 0.433), and duration of hospitalization ( P = 1.000) were similar. Conclusion: The pre-IVF patients have some significant findings than non-IVF controls suggesting that hysteroscopic evaluation/intervention has the potential to improve IVF outcomes. Furthermore, the pre-IVF patients opting for a repeat cycle had more significant endometrial pathologies, whose treatment could improve IVF outcomes. Hysteroscopy may improve the evaluation of the patients with failed IVF, however a risk-based approach should be applied to first IVF cycle patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medicine and Health Development
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmh.ijmh_42_24
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Hysteroscopy Findings and Outcomes between Pre-in vitro- fertilization (IVF) and Non-IVF Women with Infertility

Omotayo Salami, Ime Ani, John O. Imaralu, Olukemi E. Grillo et al.
International Journal of Medicine and Health Development
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Comparison of Hysteroscopy Findings and Outcomes between Pre-in vitro- fertilization (IVF) and Non-IVF Women with Infertility

Omotayo Salami, Ime Ani, John O. Imaralu, Olukemi E. Grillo, Remilekun F. Atunrase-Sotola, Chinedu T. Elejere
article en

Abstract

A bstract Introduction: Hysteroscopy remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of endometrial pathologies; however, the benefit of routine hysteroscopy before in vitro -fertilization (IVF) is controversial. Objectives: To compare findings between pre-IVF and non-IVF patients and also to determine the benefit of routine hysteroscopy before a first IVF cycle. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of hysteroscopy procedures was performed between 2019 and 2023. The case records of 101 patients, 60 pre-IVF (cases) and 41 non-IVF (controls), were extracted using a proforma designed by the authors. The independent-sample t test was used to compare the means of groups studied, while the chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The pre-IVF patients had undergone significantly more diagnostic procedures ( P = 0.001), combinations of hysteroscopy with laparoscopy ( P = 0.011) and findings with potential to improve the IVF outcomes ( P = 0.007) when compared to the non-IVF patients. The repeat IVF patients had significantly more endometrial pathologies ( P = 0.019, OR = 3.64, CI = 1.23–10.73) and requirement for operative procedures ( P = 0.012, OR = 2.16, CI = 1.08–4.33), compared to the first cycle IVF patients. The duration of hysteroscopy ( P = 0.170), intraoperative complications ( P = 0.433), and duration of hospitalization ( P = 1.000) were similar. Conclusion: The pre-IVF patients have some significant findings than non-IVF controls suggesting that hysteroscopic evaluation/intervention has the potential to improve IVF outcomes. Furthermore, the pre-IVF patients opting for a repeat cycle had more significant endometrial pathologies, whose treatment could improve IVF outcomes. Hysteroscopy may improve the evaluation of the patients with failed IVF, however a risk-based approach should be applied to first IVF cycle patients.

International Journal of Medicine and Health DevelopmentVol. 30(2)
Babcock University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.