Validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in a Uruguayan sample

Background: The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), introduced by Davis in 1980, remains a widely used self-report tool designed to assess empathy from a multidimensional perspective, with adaptations for various languages and populations. However, many studies examining its psychometric properties have failed to replicate the original four-factor structure. Method: This instrumental study applied Classical Test Theory to adapt the IRI for use in Uruguay, with a sample of 858 adult participants (640 females, 218 males). Results: The original 28-item scale did not show a good fit with the four-factor model. Removing the reversed items led to an acceptable fit for both the original and a three-factor model. Conclusion: These findings suggest that a shortened version of the scale, excluding the reversed items, would be more suitable for this population. Further research on the impact of reversed items is recommended. The study highlights the importance of ongoing investigation into the psychometric properties of the IRI, as well as the theoretical and practical implications of using a shortened version.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ciencias Psicológicas
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v19i1.4005
Primary Topic
Stress and Burnout Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in a Uruguayan sample

Daniel Costa Ball, Marcela Carballo, Martín Bidegain
Ciencias Psicológicas
Stress and Burnout Research
article

Validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in a Uruguayan sample

Daniel Costa Ball, Marcela Carballo, Martín Bidegain
article en

Abstract

Background: The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), introduced by Davis in 1980, remains a widely used self-report tool designed to assess empathy from a multidimensional perspective, with adaptations for various languages and populations. However, many studies examining its psychometric properties have failed to replicate the original four-factor structure. Method: This instrumental study applied Classical Test Theory to adapt the IRI for use in Uruguay, with a sample of 858 adult participants (640 females, 218 males). Results: The original 28-item scale did not show a good fit with the four-factor model. Removing the reversed items led to an acceptable fit for both the original and a three-factor model. Conclusion: These findings suggest that a shortened version of the scale, excluding the reversed items, would be more suitable for this population. Further research on the impact of reversed items is recommended. The study highlights the importance of ongoing investigation into the psychometric properties of the IRI, as well as the theoretical and practical implications of using a shortened version.

Ciencias Psicológicas
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Stress and Burnout Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.