Why are you not doing research in your home country? dissecting expectations of southern researchers

Why are you not researching your home country, and why did you choose "elsewhere"? Would research in another country in the South be familiar to you? Assumptions and prompts are often posed to southern researchers when they select their fieldwork and case studies. This article dissects the rationale behind southern researchers based in Western academia choosing countries other than their home, the fieldwork experience, and the creation of post-fieldwork knowledge. Through a reflexive approach, we discuss pre-fieldwork training, moving positionalities, gender and religious identities during fieldwork encounters and the imposition of Western perspectives in knowledge creation. To do so, we interrogate the entrenched inequalities in global power dynamics within the architecture of knowledge creation, emphasising the need to decolonise knowledge and (re)evaluate research ethics and training. This article advocates for re-considering knowledge creation and power shifting as a process rather than the outcome, and fieldwork as an essential knowledge creation component enabling post-knowledge production and doing research differently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development in Practice
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2025.2481519
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why are you not doing research in your home country? dissecting expectations of southern researchers

Ahmed El Assal, Ilaha Abasli, Yasmine Hafez
1 citations
Development in Practice
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
4.20
article

Why are you not doing research in your home country? dissecting expectations of southern researchers

Ahmed El Assal, Ilaha Abasli, Yasmine Hafez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Why are you not researching your home country, and why did you choose "elsewhere"? Would research in another country in the South be familiar to you? Assumptions and prompts are often posed to southern researchers when they select their fieldwork and case studies. This article dissects the rationale behind southern researchers based in Western academia choosing countries other than their home, the fieldwork experience, and the creation of post-fieldwork knowledge. Through a reflexive approach, we discuss pre-fieldwork training, moving positionalities, gender and religious identities during fieldwork encounters and the imposition of Western perspectives in knowledge creation. To do so, we interrogate the entrenched inequalities in global power dynamics within the architecture of knowledge creation, emphasising the need to decolonise knowledge and (re)evaluate research ethics and training. This article advocates for re-considering knowledge creation and power shifting as a process rather than the outcome, and fieldwork as an essential knowledge creation component enabling post-knowledge production and doing research differently.

Development in PracticeVol. 35(8)
Universidad de Londres (MX), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.