Quantification of endogenous marker acid‐insoluble ash in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds

Abstract This study investigates the efficacy of acid‐insoluble ash (AIA) as an endogenous digestibility marker in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds. AIA is a naturally occurring, low‐cost alternative to external markers such as chromic oxide and yttrium oxide. External markers are often impractical in the production of small batches of feed manufactured under commercial settings due to cost and logistical constraints. This manuscript is the first of its kind to quantify the AIA content of 18 commercial aquaculture feeds and 27 commercial ingredients from diverse origins, as well as the recuperation rate of pure AIA. Samples were acquired from various national and international sources based on currently available stock; all samples were analyzed in quadruplets for statistical analysis. Results indicated significant variation in AIA levels across different ingredient categories ( p < 0.05), with marine‐based meals and rendered animal meals exhibiting the highest AIA concentrations (up to 25.8% and 5.0%, respectively), while vegetable meals displayed the lowest AIA content (up to 0.2%). Shrimp and crab meals had particularly high AIA levels due to their mineral‐rich exoskeletons (4.7% and 25.8%, respectively), and meals that had undergone certain commercial processing to increase the meal quality had lower AIA content than their regular counterparts (avian: 2.9% for high quality and 4.4% for regular quality; meat: 0.13% for high quality and 0.8% for regular quality). Additionally, a limit of quantification (LOQ) was determined to define the confidence range of the utilized AIA protocol. This study highlights the importance of considering diet composition and ingredient origin in diet formulation to ensure consistent nutritional outcomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a wide range of commercial diets contain a quantifiable amount of AIA. The findings suggest that AIA can serve as a reliable and cost‐effective marker for in‐vivo digestibility studies, aiding feed manufacturers and farm managers in optimizing production performance by rapidly assessing feed quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.70015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of endogenous marker acid‐insoluble ash in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds

Jorge A. Suárez, Julio Camperio, Daniel D. Benetti, Brett D. Glencross
1 citations
Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
2.27
article

Quantification of endogenous marker acid‐insoluble ash in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds

Jorge A. Suárez, Julio Camperio, Daniel D. Benetti, Brett D. Glencross
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the efficacy of acid‐insoluble ash (AIA) as an endogenous digestibility marker in commercial aquaculture ingredients and feeds. AIA is a naturally occurring, low‐cost alternative to external markers such as chromic oxide and yttrium oxide. External markers are often impractical in the production of small batches of feed manufactured under commercial settings due to cost and logistical constraints. This manuscript is the first of its kind to quantify the AIA content of 18 commercial aquaculture feeds and 27 commercial ingredients from diverse origins, as well as the recuperation rate of pure AIA. Samples were acquired from various national and international sources based on currently available stock; all samples were analyzed in quadruplets for statistical analysis. Results indicated significant variation in AIA levels across different ingredient categories ( p < 0.05), with marine‐based meals and rendered animal meals exhibiting the highest AIA concentrations (up to 25.8% and 5.0%, respectively), while vegetable meals displayed the lowest AIA content (up to 0.2%). Shrimp and crab meals had particularly high AIA levels due to their mineral‐rich exoskeletons (4.7% and 25.8%, respectively), and meals that had undergone certain commercial processing to increase the meal quality had lower AIA content than their regular counterparts (avian: 2.9% for high quality and 4.4% for regular quality; meat: 0.13% for high quality and 0.8% for regular quality). Additionally, a limit of quantification (LOQ) was determined to define the confidence range of the utilized AIA protocol. This study highlights the importance of considering diet composition and ingredient origin in diet formulation to ensure consistent nutritional outcomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a wide range of commercial diets contain a quantifiable amount of AIA. The findings suggest that AIA can serve as a reliable and cost‐effective marker for in‐vivo digestibility studies, aiding feed manufacturers and farm managers in optimizing production performance by rapidly assessing feed quality.

Journal of the World Aquaculture SocietyVol. 56(2)
University of Stirling (GB), University of Miami (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.